Modeling the Impacts of Facility Type, Trip Characteristics, and Trip Stressors on Cyclists’ Comfort Levels Utilizing Crowdsourced Data

Author:

Blanc Bryan1,Figliozzi Miguel2

Affiliation:

1. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, 621 Southwest Morrison Street, Suite 1250, Portland, OR 97205

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751–CEE, Portland, OR 97207-0751

Abstract

Transportation agencies are striving to increase the comfort of their bicycle networks in an effort to improve the experience of existing cyclists and to attract new cyclists. To increase bicycle mode share is challenging and has motivated research to understand where and what types of bicycle improvements yield the maximum net benefit in terms of increased ridership, comfort, and safety. Data sets related to cyclists’ comfort levels as a function of bicycle infrastructure are nonexistent at the state or local level. To fill this data gap, the Oregon Department of Transportation sponsored the development of ORcycle, a smartphone application designed to collect cyclist travel, comfort, and safety information. The research reported in this paper utilized ORcycle data to model cyclists’ comfort levels as a function of bicycle facility types, sources of stress along the trip, and trip characteristics (e.g., purpose, length, frequency, and day of the week). Ordinal logistic regression models were estimated, and the results indicated that facility types such as bicycle boulevards and separated paths did have a significant positive impact on cyclists’ comfort levels. Other variables (e.g., sources of stress along the trip, trip purpose, and trip distance) also were found to have significant impacts on comfort levels. A sensitivity analysis and a policy discussion highlight how important it is to reduce sources of stress along bicycle routes to increase bicycle ridership and attract new cyclists.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3