Evaluation of International Friction Index Coefficients for Various Devices

Author:

Flintsch Gerardo W.1,Izeppi Edgar de León1,McGhee Kevin K.2,Roa Julio Alberto3

Affiliation:

1. Center for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

2. Virginia Transportation Research Council, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0105.

Abstract

This paper presents a research effort to compare and harmonize measurements of texture and skid resistance taken with various devices at the Virginia Smart Road in May 2008 by the members of the Virginia Consortium for Pavement Surface Properties. There have been numerous efforts by different countries and agencies to understand better the relationship and behavior of different friction-testing devices and the influence of texture, speed, and other external conditions on these measurements. Measurements obtained with different types of equipment on 24 pavement sections with a wide range of textures were compared, and the relationship between friction and speed for the different pavement sections and devices was studied. Data were collected with two locked-wheel skid trailers, a Griptester, and a dynamic friction tester. Nine asphalt sections were tested; six were Superpave® mixes, two were stone matrix asphalt, and one was an open-graded friction course. The concrete sections tested included one continuously reinforced concrete pavement with tined finishing and two epoxy overlays. Even though all steps included in the specifications derived from the experiments by the Permanent International Association of Road Congresses (PIARC) were followed, the results obtained were not satisfactory. From a theoretical standpoint, all the values computed with the international friction index (IFI) F60 should be equal, but this was not the case. Discrepancies in the IFI values calculated for the different devices suggest that the original coefficients determined during the PIARC experiment may need to be adjusted for the devices evaluated, before the IFI can be implemented by the participating agencies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3