Difficult Nature of Minimum Voids in the Mineral Aggregate: Historical Perspective

Author:

Coree Brian J.1,Hislop Walter P.1

Affiliation:

1. Iowa State University, Center for Transportation Research and Education, 484 Town Engineering, Ames, IA 50011

Abstract

Several researchers have recently discussed problems in achieving the minimum voids in the mineral aggregate (VMA) requirements specified in Superpave volumetric mix design. The minimum VMA requirements are often difficult to achieve; they can “fail” mixes that have acceptable performance records and they may require a higher asphalt content, leading to higher project costs. To address these issues, the background and logic behind the minimum VMA requirement are reexamined. A review of asphalt mix design methods indicates that a minimum VMA requirement was not used until the 1950s, when Norman W. McLeod almost single-handedly advanced VMA to a critical design parameter. In 1962, the Asphalt Institute specified VMA as a Marshall mix design requirement, but as late as 1985 it was still misused by many highway agencies. Only through the Strategic Highway Research Program and the implementation of Superpave has the minimum VMA requirement become a design standard. The literature review uncovered several problems with specifying minimum VMA: ( a) the field data from which the minimum VMA requirements were established could not be found in the literature, ( b) the original VMA requirements were based on Marshall compaction, and ( c) the precision of the testing necessary for measuring VMA is not good enough for rigid enforcement of VMA specifications. In light of the information presented, it appears clear that the minimum VMA requirements need to be reexamined in light of Superpave and validated with field data.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3