Full-Scale Controlled Comparison of Alternative Information Formats for Stated Choice Exercises

Author:

Mitrani Alex1

Affiliation:

1. Steer Davies Gleave Chile, Avenida Holanda 100, Oficina 504, Providencia, Santiago 7510021, Chile

Abstract

Stated choice experiments are used regularly as part of the evaluation of major transport infrastructure investments, and their design can have an important effect on the accuracy of demand forecasts. Research in the field of behavioral economics has shown that format details can significantly influence how people respond to questions. The increasing ubiquity of the Internet and smartphones has produced rapid changes in survey data collection methods and has implications for stated choice experiment formats. The foregoing trends suggest that there may be opportunities to improve the stated choice formats in common use. However, it will be difficult to improve these formats without systematic, controlled experiments. Four existing publications reporting full-scale controlled comparisons of alternative formats for stated choice exercises were found, and this study presents another such experiment. Timelines are a graphical way of presenting travel time components, similar to a stacked bar chart. The use of timelines was tested as part of an Internet-based stated choice survey of car drivers in Lima, Peru. The questionnaire included a route choice exercise and a mode choice exercise. The respondents were assigned randomly to one of two formats: the timeline format and a text-only format. The timeline and the text-only choice models are similar for both choice exercises. There are indications that the timeline format makes complex choices easier. The time to choose was significantly lower with the timeline format in the mode choice exercise, and the timeline format produced significant constants for the new modes, unlike the text-only format.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3