Measuring Performance of Public Engagement in Transportation Planning

Author:

Wagner Jason1

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 505 East Huntland Drive, Suite 455, Austin, TX 78752.

Abstract

Measuring performance provides a variety of benefits: establishing accountability with the public, enabling management and performance improvements, increasing transparency, and building public trust. The most recent transportation authorization bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, includes a heavy focus on performance measurement. Despite such strong reasons, measuring the performance of public engagement in transportation planning has proved difficult for a variety of issues, including unclear goals, limited funding, and the situational nature of engagement activities. To address some of these issues, the literature of best practices for public engagement in transportation planning is analyzed, and three principles that encapsulate the contained concepts are derived. The three principles include accessible events, engaging interactions, and an outcome-oriented process. The author developed a performance scorecard rubric to operationalize the three principles. The scorecard provides an intuitive and concise method to measure and display performance information. This paper organizes the disparate and fragmented literature of recommended practices into a usable framework that enables practitioners to understand more easily the important aspects of public engagement and to better measure the performance of engagement activities. The paper also advances the discourse surrounding public engagement and performance measurement. Additional study would provide opportunities for further refinement and investigation of the efficacy of the system developed in a real-world setting.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference12 articles.

1. Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement

2. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation

3. O'ConnorR., SchwartzM., SchaadJ., and BoydD. State of the Practice: White Paper on Public Involvement. Transportation in the New Millennium, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 1–7.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3