Modeling Route Choice of Utilitarian Bikeshare Users with GPS Data

Author:

Khatri Ranjit1,Cherry Christopher R.2,Nambisan Shashi S.3,Han Lee D.4

Affiliation:

1. Room 311, John D. Tickle Building, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996-2313

2. Room 321, John D. Tickle Building, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996-2313

3. Room 320, John D. Tickle Building, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996-2313

4. Room 319, John D. Tickle Building, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996-2313

Abstract

To understand a bicyclist’s route choice is difficult, given the many factors that influence the attractiveness of different routes. The advent of low-cost GPS devices has made route choice analysis more precise. Bikeshare, with instrumented bikes, allows for better assessment of revealed route preference of a large subpopulation of cyclists. This study used GPS data obtained from 9,101 trips made by 1,866 users of Grid Bikeshare, Phoenix, Arizona. This unique bikeshare system relied on Social Bicycles’ onboard telematics, which allowed nonstation origins and destinations, and operated on a grid street network. The system enabled unique route choice analysis. The trips studied included only direct utilitarian trips. Circuitous trips that could have included multiple destinations or could have been recreational trips were removed. The analysis focused on facility use assessment and route choice behavior. The results were compared between two categories of bikeshare users: registered users and casual users. Registered users made shorter trips on roads with low volume and preferred bike-specific infrastructure. A path size logit model was used to model route choice. Riders were sensitive to travel distance, with little deviation from the shortest path to use more bike-friendly infrastructure. Travel on the bike-specific facilities was equivalent to a decrease in distance by 44.9% (compared with 53.3% for casual users). Left turns imposed higher disutility than right turns did for casual users. The proportion of one-way segments, annual average daily traffic values, and length of trip had a negative influence on route choice, and a number of signalized intersections had a positive influence on route selection. The results were also compared with those of earlier studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3