Critical Review of Voids in Mineral Aggregate Requirements in Superpave

Author:

Kandhal Prithvi S.1,Foo Kee Y.2,Mallick Rajib B.1

Affiliation:

1. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849

2. Civil Engineering and Construction Department, Bradley University, 1501 West Bradley Avenue, Peoria, IL 61606-9989

Abstract

Reports of increased difficulties in meeting the minimum voids in mineral aggregate (VMA) requirements have surfaced with the recent use of Superpave volumetric mix design. The low VMA of Superpave mixes generally can be contributed to the increased compactive effort by the Superpave gyratory compactor. This has led to the increased use of coarser asphalt mixes (gradations near the lower control points). However, the minimum VMA requirements in Superpave volumetric mix design for these coarse mixes are the same as those developed for the dense mixes designed by the Marshall method. Literature review has indicated that the rationale behind the minimum VMA requirement was to incorporate at least a minimum permissible asphalt content into the mix to ensure its durability. Studies have shown that asphalt mix durability is directly related to asphalt film thickness. Therefore, the minimum VMA should be based on the minimum desirable asphalt film thickness instead of on a minimum asphalt content because the latter will be different for mixes with different gradations. Mixes with coarse gradation (and, therefore, a low surface area) have difficulty meeting the minimum VMA requirement based on minimum asphalt content despite thick asphalt films. A rational approach based on a minimum asphalt film thickness has been proposed and validated. The film thickness approach represents a more direct, equitable, and appropriate method of ensuring asphalt mix durability, and it encompasses various mix gradations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3