Extending Analysis of Older Drivers’ Scanning Patterns at Intersections

Author:

Yamani Yusuke1,Samuel Siby2,Roman Gerardino Luis2,Fisher Donald L.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, College of Sciences, Old Dominion University, 236 B Mills Godwin Building, Norfolk, VA 23529

2. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 220A Engineering Lab, 160 Governors Drive, Amherst, MA 01003

Abstract

Drivers 75 years old and older are overrepresented in fatal crashes at intersections, particularly while turning left. Previous research suggested that this event could occur because older drivers glance less frequently toward potential hazards in the right or left extremities (e.g., cross traffic) when navigating intersections than do middle-aged drivers. However, the previous research did not examine whether older drivers turning left at signalized four-way intersections glanced less frequently at the location from which opposing traffic could come than did middle-aged drivers. Nor did the previous research determine whether failure to glance (either at cross or opposing traffic) was associated with actual crashes since, at least in the driving simulator experiments, no hazards (threat vehicles) ever actually materialized. A driving simulator study involving 18 older and 11 middle-aged drivers examined age-related differences in drivers’ scanning patterns at intersections with both cross and opposing traffic and the effect of the failure to scan on simulator crashes. Drivers’ glances toward all potential hazards were recorded with an eye tracker at stop-controlled T-intersections and signalized four-way intersections. The results demonstrated that the older drivers were less likely to glance toward cross traffic when they first entered a stop-controlled T-intersection or a signalized four-way signalized intersection and also were less likely to glance toward opposing traffic as they turned into the far travel lane when making a left turn at a signalized four-way intersection, compared with the middle-aged drivers. The results also demonstrated that drivers (both older and middle-aged) were much more likely to crash if they failed to glance toward potential threats.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Head Scanning Behavior Predicts Hazard Detection Safety Before Entering an Intersection;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2021-08-26

2. Automatic processing of gaze movements to quantify gaze scanning behaviors in a driving simulator;Behavior Research Methods;2020-08-03

3. The Effects of Age and Central Field Loss on Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections;Translational Vision Science & Technology;2019-09-16

4. Effect of Visual and Auditory Alerts on Older Drivers’ Glances toward Latent Hazards while Turning Left at Intersections;Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board;2019-05-04

5. Older Adult Multitasking Performance Using a Gaze-Contingent Useful Field of View;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2017-12-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3