Specimen Geometry Study for Direct Tension Test Based on Mechanical Tests and Air Void Variation in Asphalt Concrete Specimens Compacted by Superpave Gyratory Compactor

Author:

Chehab Ghassan R.1,O’Quinn Emily1,Richard Kim Y.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908

Abstract

Reliable materials characterization and performance prediction testing of asphalt concrete requires specimens that can be treated as statistically homogeneous and representative of the material being tested. The objective of this study was to select a proper specimen geometry that could be used for uniaxial tensile testing. Selection was based on the variation of air void content along the height of specimens cut and cored from specimens compacted by the Superpave gyratory compactor (SGC) and on the representative behavior under mechanical testing. From measurement and comparison of air void contents in cut and cored specimens, it was observed for several geometries that sections at the top and bottom and those adjacent to the mold walls have a higher air void content than do those in the middle. It is thus imperative that test specimens be cut and cored from larger-size SGC specimens. Complex modulus and constant crosshead-rate monotonic tests were conducted for four geometries—75 × 115, 75 × 150, 100 × 150, and 100 × 200 mm—to study the effect of geometry boundary conditions on responses. On the basis of graphical and statistical analysis, it was determined that there was an effect on the dynamic modulus at certain frequencies but no effect on the phase angle. Except for 75 × 115 mm, all geometries behaved similarly under the monotonic test. From these findings and other considerations, it is recommended that the 75- × 150-mm geometry, which is more conservative, and the 100- × 150-mm geometry be used for tensile testing.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3