Modeling the Impact of Subject and Opponent Vehicles on Crash Severity in Two-Vehicle Collisions

Author:

Torrão Guilhermina A.1,Coelho Margarida C.1,Rouphail Nagui M.2

Affiliation:

1. Center for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

2. North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.

Abstract

The main goal of this research was to develop models for crash severity prediction in a subject vehicle while taking into account the impact of both vehicles involved (Vehicles V1 and V2). Three binary targets were modeled: FatalSIK (to predict overall severity), FatalSIKV1 (to predict the probability of a serious injury, fatality, or both in Vehicle V1), and FatalSIKV2 (to predict the probability of a serious injury, fatality, or both in Vehicle V2). For the period from 2006 to 2010, 874 collisions involving injuries, fatalities, or both were analyzed. However, the crash sample included few severe events. Because imbalanced data introduce a bias toward the majority class (nonsevere crashes), in predictive modeling, they would result in less accurate predictions of the minority class (severe crashes). For the challenge imposed by small sample size and imbalanced data to be overcome, an important methodology was developed on the basis of a resampling strategy by using 10 stratified random samples for model evaluation. The effect of vehicle characteristics such as weight, engine size, wheelbase, and registration year (age of vehicle) were explored. Logistic regression analysis for FatalSIK suggested that the age of the vehicle and the type of collision were significant predictors (p < .0084 and .0346, respectively). Models FatalSIKV1 and FatalSIKV2 showed that the engine size of the opponent vehicle was statistically significant in predicting severity (p < .0762 and p < .03875, respectively). Models for FatalSIKV1 and FatalSIKV2 yielded satisfactory results when evaluated with the 10 stratified random samples: 61.2% [standard deviation (SD) = 2.4] and 61.4% (SD = 3.1), respectively.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3