Determining Air Void Content of Compacted Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures

Author:

Crouch L. K.1,Copeland Audrey R.1,Todd Walker C.1,Maxwell Richard A.1,Duncan Gregory M.2,Goodwin William A.3,Badoe Daniel A.1,Wayne Leimer H.4

Affiliation:

1. Civil Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Box 5015 TTU, Cookeville, TN 38505

2. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Suite 700, J. K. Polk Building, 505 Deaderick Street, Nashville, TN 37243

3. Civil Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, P.O. Box 31515, Knoxville, TN 37930-1515

4. Geosciences, Tennessee Technological University, Box 5062 TTU, Cookeville, TN 38505

Abstract

A project to develop a new method or adapt a current method with wide applicability for determining bulk specific gravity of compacted hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures ( Gmb) is described. A more reliable Gmb would result in more reliable HMA volumetric properties, specifically, percent air voids. Consequently, pavement distress types such as rutting, bleeding, stripping, and age hardening (whose occurrence is related to percent air voids, among other factors) could be avoided more often. The project goal was accomplished in three steps. In Step 1, a literature review and survey of state departments of transportation revealed 13 existing Gmb determination techniques. In Step 2, a feasibility study of the seven methods selected was conducted to evaluate cost, logistical factors, and preliminary repeatability. In the final step, 50 compacted HMA samples and four aluminum cylinders were used to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the four methods selected. The dimensional analysis (AASHTO T269) and the parafilm (ASTM D1188) methods were found to form upper bounds for true sample air voids, whereas the saturated surface-dry method (AASHTO T166) was found to form a lower bound for true air voids. Although the true air voids can never be determined, for 90% of Tennessee Department of Transportation sample groups tested, the InstroTek Corelok method yielded results in this range between the upper and lower bounds for accurate air void results. In the precision and accuracy evaluation, all four methods were found to be capable of producing high-precision results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference4 articles.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3