Abstract
One of the daunting challenges involved in reviewing a 750-page standard tome on a subject like astronomy is being able to evaluate all aspects of the volume, covering technical data as well as any possible impact of subject matter on other disciplines. The editors, mindful of their readership consisting of both “insiders” and “outsiders”, have taken decisive steps towards making Hellenistic astronomy accessible and comprehensible, with an appropriate balance between complex graphs and arithmetic equations and more general topics, as well as a glossary of technical terminology. The present reviewer, an unrepentant “outsider”, will attempt to focus on some key issues involving the connections between Babylonian and Greek astronomy in the period in question, as well as the impact of astronomy as a whole.
Reviewed by: M. J. Geller,
Published Online (2021-08-31)Copyright © 2021 by M. J. GellerThis open access publication is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND)
Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/aestimatio/article/view/37730/28731
Corresponding Author: M. J. Geller,University College LondonE-Mail: mark.geller@fu-berlin.de
Publisher
University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL
Reference9 articles.
1. Drower, E. S. 1946. “A Phylactery for Rue (An Invocation of the Personified Herb)”. Orientalia ns 15: 324–346.
2. Geller, M. J. 1997. “The Last Wedge”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 87: 43–95.
3. Geller, M. J. 2005. “Persian Influence on Aramaic?”. Pp. 31–39 in E. Dabrowa ed. Ancient Iran and Its Neighbours: Studies in Honour of Prof. Jósef Wolski on Occasion of his 95th Birthday. Cracow.
4. Hunger, H. and T. de Jong. 2014. “Almanac W22340 from Uruk: The Latest Datable Cuneiform Tablet”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 104: 182–194.
5. Labat, R. 1951. Traité akkadien de diagnostics et pronostics médicaux. Paris/Leiden.