Life cycle carbon analysis of packaging products containing purposely grown nonwood fibers: A case study on the use of switchgrass pulp for linerboard and corrugating medium

Abstract

Sustainability is driving innovation in the pulp and paper industry to produce goods with lower carbon footprints. Although most of the efforts are currently focused on increasing energy efficiency or switching to renewable fuels, the attention toward alternative feedstocks has increased in recent years. Claims of nonwood fibers requiring lower use of chemicals and energy than wood fibers, along with negative consumer perceptions of tree felling, are helping purposely grown nonwoods to gain market share. The potential nonwood fiber environmental superiority over virgin or recycled wood fibers remains controversial and is often driven more by emotion and public perception rather than facts. This paper estimates the carbon footprint of corrugating medium and linerboard containing switchgrass pulp compared to analogous wood-based materials. The study includes a life cycle carbon analysis spanning from cradle to gate, which comprises stages for fiber production, pulping, papermaking, and corresponding transportation. Carbon footprints for virgin linerboard, recycled linerboard, virgin medium, and recycled medium were estimated at around 510, 620, 460, and 670 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per metric ton (kg CO2eq/t), respectively. Replacing 30% of the virgin or recycled material with switchgrass pulp translated into carbon footprint increases of around 60%, 45%, 62%, and 38%, respectively. Thus, for the proposed case study, the results suggest that switchgrass-based medium and linerboard can present a higher carbon footprint than products made from virgin and recycled wood fibers. The main driver is the production of nonwood mechanical pulp. This study was designed to mitigate part of the uncertainty around the environmental sustainability of medium and linerboard made from the selected purposely grown nonwood fibers.