Comparative analysis and benchmarking of commercial and emerging fast pyrolysis technologies

Author:

BELE GEORGIANA,BENALI MARZOUK,STUART PAUL

Abstract

It is well established that producing sustainable fuels and replacing the fossil-based ones is one of the key solutions to achieving net-zero emissions goals. One of the most advanced commercial-scale pathways to biofuels available today is fast pyrolysis. However, due to the need for a supportive regulatory environment and mitigation strategies for uncertainties related to costs and feedstock quality, fast pyrolysis is not yet being widely implemented. In this case study, three fast pyrolysis technologies with a technology readiness level (TRL) of 6 and above have been compared to distinguish between them and identify the conditions under which they are economically viable. The circulating fluidized bed (CFB), rotating cone (RC), and mechanically assisted fluidized bed (MFB) fast pyrolysis technologies were considered. First, the flow diagram and a mass and energy balance comparison were addressed. It was revealed that the RC configuration has better bio-oil yields because it can handle smaller particles. The MFB configuration has a progressive condensation unit at the end of the process, which produces a nearly dry oil having a higher energy content. Four implementation scenarios were studied. The first was the fast pyrolysis standalone process, where all options had marginal economic attractiveness, and the RC configuration economically outperformed the other two. Integration of a fast pyrolysis plant into a sawmill in the second scenario was found to bring significant improvements in revenues and internal rate of return (IRR). Realization of the full value of bio-oil (the third scenario) brought significantly more revenues for the MFB. Finally, the fourth scenario involved adding a progressive condensation unit, which increased the capital expenditure (CAPEX) by 3%–4% while increasing revenues by 32%–35%. A sensitivity analysis highlighted the importance of financial support towards capital cost and the full valuation of bio-oil for the economic viability of fast pyrolysis processes. Progressive condensation leading to more added-value bio-oil makes the standalone fast pyrolysis process more profitable.

Publisher

TAPPI

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,General Materials Science,Media Technology,General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry

Reference43 articles.

1. Pattiya, A., Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction for Energy Applications (L. Rosendahl, Ed.), Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK, 2018, pp.3-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101029-7.00001-1.

2. Bioeconomy Institute, “Fast pyrolysis pilot plants,” Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2021. Available [Online] https://www.biorenew.iastate.edu/research/thermochemical/fastpyrolysis <01May2023>.

3. Bioeconomy Institute, “Iowa State University, BEI Partner in RAPID Institute,” Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2021. Available [Online] https://www.biorenew.iastate.edu/research/rapid <01May2023>.

4. Bridgwater, T., Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev. 62(1): 118(2018). https://doi.org/10.1595/205651318X696693.

5. Bridgwater, T. and Maniatis, K., in Molecular to Global Photosynthesis (M.D. Archer and J. Barber, Eds.), Series on Photoconversion of Solar Energy: Volume 2, World Scientific, Singapore, 2004, pp. 521-611. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860945496_0010.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Study on the pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of municipal solid waste in a fixed bed;Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management;2024-03-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3