Author:
FRANK BENJAMIN,CASH DOUGLAS
Abstract
While multiple test procedures have been developed to assess the inherent compressive strength of corrugated materials (edge crush test, ECT), limited work has explored the appropriateness of each in the context of box compression modeling. This study incorporates a variety of real-world samples, highlighting the varying challenges different ECT methods face in measuring the intrinsic compressive resistance of combined corrugated board. We examine each of these methods as inputs for different types of models, as well as discuss the propagation of measurement variation through the modeling effort. By highlighting the cases in which a given ECT method no longer proves to be an optimal parameter in box compression strength modeling, we explore how we might better measure this material property.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,General Materials Science,Media Technology,General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry
Reference43 articles.
1. McKee, R.C., Gander, J.W., and Wachuta, J.R., Paperboard Packag. 48(8): 149(1963).
2. Frank, B., Packag. Technol. Sci. 27(2): 105(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2019.
3. Fadiji, T., Coetzee, C.J., Berry, T.M., et al., Biosyst. Eng. 174: 20(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.06.015.
4. Mrówczy´nski, D., Knitter‐Pia˛tkowska, A., and Garbowski, T., Materials 15(3): 720(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030720.
5. Park, J., Park, M., Choi, D.S., et al., Appl. Sci. 10(19): 6716(2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196716.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献