The Influence of Cement Removal Techniques on In Situ Bacterial Adhesion and Biodegradation at the Marginal Interface of Ceramic Laminates

Author:

de Brito OFF1,Sandes JM2,de Lima FCG3,Oliveira JB4,Alves LC5,Brayner FA6,de Melo Monteiro GQ7

Affiliation:

1. *Oscar Felipe Fonseca de Brito, DDS, MSc, PhD, Dental School, University of Pernambuco, FOP/UPE, Brazil

2. Jana Messias Sandes, BSc, MSc, PhD, Electronic Microscopy, Laboratory of Immunopathology Keizo Asami, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil

3. Fernanda Cristina Gomes de Lima, BSc, MSc, PhD, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Parasitology, Institute Aggeu Magalhães – Fiocruz, Pernambuco, Brazil

4. Jorge Belém Oliveira Júnior, BSc, MSc, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Parasitology, Institute Aggeu Magalhães - Fiocruz, Pernambuco, Brazil

5. Luiz Carlos Alves, Biol, MSc, PhD, Electronic Microscopy, Laboratory of Immunopathology Keizo Asami, Federal University of Pernambuco and Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Parasitology, Institute Aggeu Magalhães - Fiocruz, Pernambuco, Brazil

6. Fábio André Brayner, Biol, MSc, PhD, Electronic Microscopy, Laboratory of Immunopathology Keizo Asami, Federal University of Pernambuco and Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Parasitology, Institute Aggeu Magalhães - Fiocruz, Pernambuco, Brazil

7. Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro, DDS, MSc, PhD, Dental School, University of Pernambuco, FOP/UPE, Brazil

Abstract

SUMMARY Objectives This in situ study aimed to analyze the influence of different resin cement removal techniques on bacterial adhesion and biodegradation at the marginal interface of ceramic laminates. Methods and Materials Eighty feldspathic ceramic (F) blocks were prepared and cemented onto bovine enamel slabs (7×2.5×2 mm). Excess cement was removed using a microbrush (MBR), a scalpel blade (SCP), or a Teflon spatula (TSP). For the biodegradation analysis, 40 disc-shaped resin cement specimens were prepared (7×1.5 mm) using a Teflon mold. The specimens were randomly allocated into two groups: (1) No finishing procedure (only Mylar strip), and (2) with finishing and polishing procedures using the Jiffy system (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) (n=20). The in situ phase consisted of using an intraoral palatal device by 20 volunteers for 7 days. Each device contained five cylindrical wells (8×3 mm), where three dental blocks and two cement specimens were included in the wells. Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a contact profilometer. A micromorphological analysis was performed under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope. Bacterial adhesion was quantitated based on the number of colony-forming units (CFU/mL) and their biofilm development potential. Results The cement removal techniques directly affected surface roughness at the marginal interface (p<0.001), and the SCP technique produced higher mean roughness, regardless of the surface area analyzed. Surface polishing protected cement specimens from further biodegradation (p=0.148). There were no differences in CFU counts between the groups after the in situ phase (p=0.96). All specimens showed CFU with a strong ability to develop a biofilm. Conclusions The techniques used for cement removal increased the surface roughness of ceramic laminates, particularly SCP, but they did not affect bacterial adhesion at the marginal interface. Surface polishing of the resin cement is recommended to mitigate biodegradation.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3