Effect of Sonic Resin Composite Delivery on Void Formation Assessed by Micro-computed Tomography

Author:

Hirata R1,Pacheco RR2,Caceres E3,Janal MN4,Romero MF5,Giannini M6,Coelho PG7,Rueggeberg FA8

Affiliation:

1. Ronaldo Hirata, DDS, MS, PhD, New York University, College of Dentistry, Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York, NY, USA

2. Rafael R. Pacheco, DDS, MSc, PhD, University of Detroit Mercy, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Detroit, MI, USA

3. Eduardo Caceres, DDS, MSc, Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA

4. Malvin N. Janal, PhD, New York University, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, and New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA

5. Mario F. Romero, DDS, Augusta University, Department of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA

6. Marcelo Giannini, DDS, MS, PhD, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba, Brazil

7. Paulo G. Coelho, DDS, MS, MSMtE, PhD, New York University, College of Dentistry, Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York, NY, USA

8. Frederick A. Rueggeberg, DDS, MSc, Augusta University, Department of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA

Abstract

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this study was to quantify the internal void volume formation in commercially available, resin composites inserted using conventional or sonic insertion methods, and analyzed using three-dimensional (3D) micro-computed tomography (μCT). Methods and Materials: Four resin composites were evaluated: one conventional (Herculite, Ultra, Kerr Corporation, Orange, CA, USA), one flowable bulk fill (SureFil SDR Flow, Dentsply International, York, PA, USA), and two packable bulk fill (SonicFill, Kerr Corporation, and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent Inc, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Eight groups were evaluated according to each resin composite type and insertion method (conventional or sonic; n=5). Forty ABS 3D-printed cylindrical molds, 5.0 mm in diameter and 4.0 mm in depth, were fabricated. For the conventional resin composite, the mold was filled incrementally (two layers), while for bulk-fill resin composites, insertion was performed in a single increment. The sonic insertion method was performed using a specific handpiece (SonicFill Handpiece, Kerr Corporation). Resin composites were light cured using a multipeak light-emitting diode light-curing unit (VALO, Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT, USA) in its regular mode. Samples were evaluated by μCT, and data were imported into software (Amira, version 5.5.2, VSG, Burlington, MA, USA) for 3D reconstruction, from which the percentage of void volume was calculated. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test at a preset alpha of 0.05. Results: The conventional insertion method resulted in reduced porosity, compared with sonic insertion, for SureFil SDR Flow and Tetric EvoCeram bulk fill. The sonic insertion method did not demonstrate any influence on void formation for Herculite Ultra or SonicFill. Conclusion: Results suggest that the sonic insertion method might increase void formation during resin composite delivery, depending on restorative material brand.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3