Preventive Use of a Resin-based Desensitizer Containing Glutaraldehyde on Tooth Sensitivity Caused by In-office Bleaching: A Randomized, Single-blind Clinical Trial

Author:

Diniz ACS1,Lima SNL2,Tavarez RRdJ3,Borges AH4,Pinto SCS5,Tonetto MR6,Loguercio AD7,Bandéca MC8

Affiliation:

1. Ana Carolina Soares Diniz, MSc student, Department of Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, MA, Brazil

2. Suellen Nogueira Linares Lima, MSc student, Department of Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, MA, Brazil

3. Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez, professor, Department of Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, MA, Brazil

4. Alvaro Henrique Borges, professor, Department of Postgraduate Program in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil

5. Shelon Cristina Souza Pinto, professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil

6. Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, professor, Department of Postgraduate Program in Integrated Dental Science, University of Cuiaba, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil

7. Alessandro Dourado Loguércio, professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil

8. Matheus Coelho Bandéca, professor, Department of Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, MA, Brazil

Abstract

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the risk and intensity of bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS) after in-office bleaching following topical application of a resin-based glutaraldehyde desensitizer. Methods: Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to the experimental (Gluma Desensitizer Liquid, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) and placebo groups. The placebo or Gluma Desensitizer Liquid was applied for one minute prior to application of an in-office bleaching gel. Bleaching was performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (three applications × 15 minutes each) over two sessions, one week apart. The color of the anterior teeth was evaluated before and 21 days after treatment using the VITA Classical shade guide, Bleachedguide 3D, and Easyshade spectrophotometer. TS during and after the bleaching was recorded according to the visual analog (VAS) and numerical rating (NRS) scales. All data were submitted to statistical analysis (α=0.05). Results: There was no significant difference in absolute risk or intensity of TS between the two groups (risk and VAS, p=0.93 and 0.31, respectively; NRS, p≥0.45). At the end of the bleaching protocol, tooth whitening was observed in both groups, as evident from color change in shade guide units (ΔSGU, 4.1-7.1; both guides) and overall color change (ΔE, 7.4-9.3 units); however, there were no significant differences in whitening between the two groups (p>0.11). Conclusion: Gluma Desensitizer Liquid was not able to reduce the risk or intensity of TS. Bleaching efficacy was not affected by application of the desensitizer.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3