Four-year Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of a Glass Ionomer Restorative System

Author:

Gurgan S1,Kutuk ZB2,Ergin E3,Oztas SS4,Cakir FY5

Affiliation:

1. Sevil Gurgan, DDS, PhD, professor, Hacettepe University, Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

2. Zeynep Bilge Kutuk, DDS, Hacettepe University, Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

3. Esra Ergin, DDS, PhD, associate professor, Hacettepe University, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

4. Sema Seval Oztas, DDS, Hacettepe University, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

5. Filiz Yalcin Cakir, DDS, PhD, professor, Hacettepe University, Restorative Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

SUMMARY Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system compared with a microfilled hybrid posterior composite in a four-year randomized clinical trial. Methods A total of 140 (80 Class 1 and 60 Class 2) lesions in 59 patients were either restored with a glass ionomer restorative system (Equia, GC, Tokyo, Japan), which was a combination of a packable glass ionomer (Equia Fil, GC) and a self-adhesive nanofilled coating (Equia Coat, GC), or with a microfilled hybrid composite (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC) in combination with a self-etch adhesive (G-Bond, GC) by two experienced operators according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline and at one, two, three, and four years postrestoration according to the modified US Public Health Service criteria. Polyvinyl siloxane impression negative replicas at each recall were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate surface characteristics. The statistical analyses were carried out with McNemar, Pearson Chi-square, and Cochran Q- tests (p<0.05). Results After four years, 126 (76 Class 1 and 50 Class 2) restorations were evaluated in 52 patients, with a recall rate of 88.1%. None of the restorations showed trends to downgrade in anatomical form, secondary caries, surface texture, postoperative sensitivity, and color match (p>0.05). Significant differences in marginal adaptation and discoloration were found at four years compared to baseline for both restorative materials for Class 1 and Class 2 restorations (p<0.05). Only one Class 2 Equia restoration was missing at three years (3.9%), and another one was missing at four years (7.7%) (p>0.05). SEM evaluations were in accordance with the clinical findings. Conclusions The use of both materials for the restoration of posterior teeth exhibited a similar and clinically successful performance after four years.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3