The Effect of Three Desensitizing Agents on Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized, Split-mouth Clinical Trial

Author:

Torres CRG1,Silva TM2,Fonseca BM3,Sales ALLS4,Holleben P5,Di Nicolo R6,Borges AB7

Affiliation:

1. Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres, DDS, PhD, associate professor, UNESP–Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil

2. Tânia Mara da Silva, DDS, MSc student, UNESP–Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil

3. Beatriz Maria da Fonseca, DDS, MSc student, UNESP–Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil

4. Ana Luísa Leme Simões Sales, DDS, MSc student, UNESP–Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil

5. Priscila Holleben, DDS, MSc, PhD student, UNESP–Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil

6. Rebeca Di Nicolo, DDS, MSc, PhD, associate professor, UNESP–Univ Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil

7. Alessandra Bühler Borges, DDS, MSc, PhD, assistant professor, UNESP–Univ. Estadual Paulista, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of three desensitizing agents to provide relief to dentin hypersensitivity after one session in a four-week follow-up. Forty selected patients participated in a double-blind study following a split-mouth model. One application of the desensitizing agents (A, Admira Protect [Voco]; B, Bifluorid 12 [Voco]; and C, Colgate Pro-Relief in office [Colgate Palmolive]) was performed in three different quadrants for each patient. Each tooth was evaluated by tactile and evaporative stimuli, and the sensitivity response was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Evaluations were performed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and after one, two, three, and four weeks. The application of Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple comparisons tests (5%) for both tactile and evaporative stimuli showed that all agents presented a significant desensitizing effect. In groups A and B this relief was maintained for four and three weeks, respectively, as measured by tactile stimulus and for four weeks with evaporative stimulus. The desensitizing effect for group C was maintained for two weeks for both tactile and evaporative stimuli. It is concluded that all desensitizing agents tested were effective in reducing sensitivity compared to baseline values. One application of Admira Protect and Bifluorid 12 presented a longer-lasting desensitizing effect than did Colgate Pro-Relief (applied in the office) on both tactile and evaporative stimuli.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3