Clinical Performance of One-step Self-etch Adhesives Applied Actively in Cervical Lesions: 24-month Clinical Trial

Author:

Zander-Grande C1,Amaral R C2,Loguercio AD3,Barroso LP4,Reis A5

Affiliation:

1. Christiana Zander-Grande, DDS, DMD, PhD, clinician at the Brazilian Army (Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brasil)

2. Roberto César do Amaral, DDS, DMD, professor, School of Dentistry, University of Oeste de Santa Catarina, Joaçaba, SC, Brasil

3. Alessandro Dourado Loguercio, DDS, DMD, PhD, professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brasil

4. Lúcia Pereira Barroso, PhD, professor, Statistics Department, Mathematics and Statistics Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

5. Alessandra Reis, DDS, PhD, professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brasil

Abstract

SUMMARY Objectives To evaluate the clinical performance of two one-step self-etch adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL) under active or passive application mode. Methods Thirty-one patients with four NCCL were enrolled in this study. One hundred and twenty-four restorations were placed according to one of the following conditions: 1) Adper Prompt L-Pop (AP), active application (APA); 2) AP, passive application (APP); 3) Xeno III (XE), active application (XEA), or 4) XE, passive application (XEP). The restorations were evaluated by the FDI World Dental Federation criteria at baseline and after six, 12, and 24 months of clinical service. The effects of adhesive, mode of application, and recall period were assessed via mixed generalized linear model (α=0.05). Results The adhesive AP and the passive application mode showed significantly higher marginal staining than did XE and active application, respectively (p<0.05). With regard to the retention rates, the active application mode yielded higher retention rates at the 24-month recall compared to the passive application, regardless of the material. The individual retention rates (95% confidence interval) of both adhesives in the active application mode were the same, 96.8% (83.8-99.4%), while in the passive application rates were 87.1% (71.2-94.9%) and 80.7% (63.7-90.8%) for XE and AP, respectively. Conclusions The active application improved the retention rates of both adhesives after 24 months and minimized the marginal staining at enamel margins.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3