Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Push-out Bond Strength of Self-adhesive and Conventional Resin Cements on Fiber Post Cementation

Author:

Santi MR1,Lins RBE2,Sahadi BO3,Soto-Montero JR4,Martins LRM5

Affiliation:

1. *Marina Rodrigues Santi, DDS, MS, PhD student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

2. Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins, DDS, MS, PhD, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

3. Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, DDS, MS, PhD student, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

4. Jorge Rodrigo Soto-Montero, DDS, MS, PhD, invited professor, University of Costa Rica, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Montes de Oca, SJ, Costa Rica

5. Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins, DDS, MS, PhD, professor, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

Abstract

SUMMARY Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and push-out bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements (SACs) and a conventional resin cement (CRC). Methods and Materials Eighty bovine incisors were divided into four groups for cementation of a fiberglass post (Whitepost - FGM Dental Group, Coral Springs, FL) with different resin cements: three SACs (Maxcem Elite, MAX - Kerr; Calibra Universal, CAL - Dentsply; and RelyX Unicem 2, RUN - 3M Oral Care) and one CRC (RelyX Ultimate, RXU - 3M Oral Care). The groups were subdivided into two groups each (n=10) for evaluation of the push-out bond strength test (POBS) after 24 hours of water storage or after thermal aging (5000 cycles), following 24 hours of storage. The failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Flexural strength (FS) and modulus of elasticity (EM) were determined using a three-point bending. Also, pH of the cements was measured over 48 hours and filler morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed by SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with a significance level set at 5%. Results: RXU presented the highest POBS at both evaluation times. Among the SACs, RUN and CAL presented significantly lower POBS than MAX in cervical and middle-thirds at the 24-hour evaluation, and in all root regions after thermocycling. Adhesive failure between the cement and dentin were the most prevalent fractures at both times evaluated. MAX presented the lowest FS and RUN showed the highest EM. The pH reached the minimal point at the 30-minute evaluation for RXU and MAX. For RUN and CAL, the minimal pH was observed at the 60-minute evaluation. RXU and RUN presented spherical and regular filler particles, while MAX and CAL presented irregularly shaped and sized filler particles. Conclusions The mechanical behavior of SACs is not superior to CRC; however, among all the SACs evaluated, MAX presented the highest POBS and stability after thermocycling evaluation. MAX also reached the closest neutral pH after 48 hours. Therefore, SACs with low initial pH and strong neutralization reactions are recommended, because these characteristics may lead to better mechanical properties and stability.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference39 articles.

1. Effect of anatomical customization of the fiber post on the bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement;Rocha;International Journal of Dentistry,2017

2. Effect of polymerization mode of two adhesive systems on push-out bond strength of fiber post to different regions of root canal dentin;Ebrahimi;Dental Research Journal,2014

3. Effect of carbodiimide on bonding durability of adhesive-cemented fiber posts in root canals;Shafiei;Operative Dentistry,2016

4. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts;Skupien;Brazilian Oral Research,2015

5. Effect of dimethyl sulfoxide on bond durability of fiber posts cemented with etch-and-rinse adhesives;Shafiei;Journal of Adhesive Prosthodontics,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3