Influence of Different Restoration Techniques on Fracture Resistance of Root-filled Teeth: In Vitro Investigation

Author:

Hshad ME1,Dalkılıç EE2,Ozturk GC3,Dogruer I4,Koray F5

Affiliation:

1. Mohamed Elmabrouk Hshad, DDS, research assistant, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Istanbul, Turkey

2. Evrim Eligüzeloğlu Dalkılıç, DDS, PhD, associate professor, Yeni Yuzyıl University Faculty of Dentistry, Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Gulgun Cansu Ozturk, DDS, PhD, assistant professor, Yeni Yüzyıl University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Istanbul, Turkey

4. Isıl Dogruer, DDS, PhD, assistant professor, Yeni Yüzyıl University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey

5. Fatma Koray, DDS, PhD, professor, Yeni Yüzyıl University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

SUMMARY Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the fracture strength of endodontically treated mandibular premolar teeth restored with composites and different reinforcement techniques. Methods and Materials: Forty-eight freshly extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were randomly divided into four groups: group IN, group CR, group FRC, and group PRF. Group IN consisted of teeth with intact crowns and served as the control group. In the other three groups, endodontic treatment was performed and standard mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. Then cavities were restored with hybrid resin composite only, flowable composite and hybrid resin composite, and Ribbond, flowable composite and hybrid resin composite in groups CR, FRC and PRF, respectively. All of the teeth were subjected to fracture by means of a universal testing machine, and compressive force was applied with a modified stainless-steel ball at a crosshead speed at 0.5 mm/min. Results: The highest values were observed in group IN, while the lowest values were determined in group CR. There was not any statistically significant difference between group CR and group FCR (p>0.05). When groups CR, FCR, and PRF were compared, group PRF showed significantly better fracture strength than did groups CR and FCR (p<0.05). It was determined that there was not any significant difference between group IN and group PRF (p>0.05). Conclusions: Polyethylene ribbon fiber considerably increases the fracture strength of mandibular premolar teeth with MOD cavities restored with composite.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3