Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Different Treatment Approaches Using a Microfilled Resin Composite and a Compomer in Class III Cavities: Two-year Results-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Different Treatment Approaches Using a Microfilled Resin Composite and a Compomer in Class III Cavities: Two-year Results

Published:2008-01-01 Issue:1 Volume:33 Page:7-14
ISSN:1559-2863
Container-title:Operative Dentistry
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Demirci M.,Yildiz E.,Uysal Ö

Abstract

Clinical Relevance For two years, the three restoration/adhesive combinations used in this study (Dyract AP/Prime & Bond NT with NRC pretreatment, Dyract AP/Prime & Bond NT with phosphoric acid pretreatment and Filtek A110/Single Bond) exhibited very good clinical performance in Class III cavities. Clinically simplified systems and handling characteristics of materials may effect their clinical performance.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

Link

http://meridian.allenpress.com/operative-dentistry/article-pdf/33/1/7/1822264/07-34.pdf

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;Clinical Oral Investigations;2023-12-28

2. Dental high-speed handpiece and ultrasonic scaler aerosol generation levels and the effect of suction and air supply;Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology;2022-08-08

3. Long-term survival and reasons for failure in direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic review;Journal of Conservative Dentistry;2021

4. Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification;Materials;2020-05-18

5. Color stability of posterior nanocomposites treated with colored beverages after brushing and thermocycling: An in vitro study;Journal of International Oral Health;2020