Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Prevention Programs in Adults Depending on Their Caries Risk Profile: One-year Results

Abstract

SUMMARYThe aim of this study was to investigate the management of incipient caries lesions in adults with two preventive protocols. A total of 44 adult patients with high, moderate and low caries risk with 516 incipient caries took part in the study. These patients were assessed for caries with International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria and were then divided into three groups depending on their caries risk profile: a high-risk group (group A), a moderate-risk group (group B), and a low-risk group (group C). Participants in each group were further divided randomly into two subgroups. In subgroups A1, B1, and C1, an intensive preventive protocol was applied, while in subgroups A2, B2, and C2, the protocol consisted only of instructions in oral hygiene. The invasive-intensive protocol included the topical application of fluoride, brushing with 5000-ppm fluoride toothpaste, use of amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide, applications of sealants for occlusal lesions (ICDAS code 2), and minimal resin restorations for occlusal lesions (ICDAS code 3). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of lesions (baseline and after one year) in the high-risk and moderate-risk groups that received the intensive protocol (groups A1 and B1), while the control groups were statistically significant different (groups A2 and B2). In the low-risk group, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of lesions (groups C1 and C2). The two different preventive protocols in the high- and moderate-risk groups presented differences in effectiveness, while in the low-risk group, no significant difference was demonstrated.