Abstract
The development and operation of new oil fields on the Arctic shelf increases the risks of oil spills, which require the use of oil spill response tools and materials that are efficient in harsh climatic conditions. The question of actual efficiency of sorbents for reducing the level of oil pollution in the conditions of the Arctic and subarctic waters is relevant. The work is aimed at a comparative study of the efficiency of sorbents of mineral and organic origin used by coastal enterprises in the Kola Bay as well as a sorbent based on chitin in model systems simulating real conditions in sea waters. The characteristics of sorption agents were determined applying ASTM F716-18 procedure. Sorption capacity was evaluated in respect of ARCO grade oil, diesel fuel and marine oil. The efficiency of sorbents was estimated in model systems “sea water – oil” at water temperature corresponding to the average annual surface temperature in the Barents Sea. Actual data on sorption capacity of commercial sorbents “Lessorb”, “Novosorb”, a sorbent based on vermiculite and chitin sorbent in relation to potential pollutants of waters were obtained. The dynamics of sea water saturation with oil products at –0.5 (±1) and 10 (±1) °С was determined. It is shown that at higher temperature the concentration of oil products in sea water column (in the presence of an oil film on the surface) is on average four times higher than at low temperature. Kinetic dependences were obtained that describe the content of oil products in water column and near-surface layer of sea water in the presence of the studied sorbents at 5 (±1) °C, corresponding to the average annual temperature in the Kola Bay of the Barents Sea. A method is proposed for evaluating the efficiency of sorbents from the values of regression coefficients characterizing the dependence of oil products content in sea water on the character of sorbent and duration of its action.
Publisher
Saint-Petersburg Mining University
Subject
Economic Geology,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Energy (miscellaneous)
Reference36 articles.
1. Pongrácz E., Hänninen N. Arctic Marine Sustainability: Arctic Maritime Businesses and the Resilience of the Marine Environment // Arctic Marine Sustainability. Cham: Springer, 2020. 504 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28404-6
2. Jacobsen S., Haver K., Gudmestad O., Tuntland Ø. Overview of Measures Specifically Designed to Prevent Oil Pol-lution in the Arctic Marine Environment from Offshore Petroleum Activities // Offshore Technology Conference, 24-26 October 2016, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. 2016. OnePetro, 2016. № OTC-27432-MS. DOI: 10.4043/27432-MS
3. Балмасов С. Судоходный трафик в акватории СМП в 2020 г. // Арктические ведомости. 2021. № 1. С. 86-101.
4. Муленко В.В., Сапрыкина К.М. Экологические и экономические риски разработки морских нефтегазовых месторождений Крайнего Севера // Территория НЕФТЕГАЗ. 2016. № 2. С. 94-99
5. Zhaoyang Yang, Zhi Chen, Kenneth Lee et al. Decision support tools for oil spill response (OSR-DSTs): Approaches, challenges, and future research perspectives // Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2021. Vol. 167. № 112313. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112313
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献