Author:
Goriachkina Svetlana Yurievna,Palevskaya Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Abstract
This article presents the study results received by the independent patent search method (the search depth is 10 years: from 2013 to 2023) of computer programs in the Russian Federation, available on the website: http://www.fips.ru/ by the main risk factors (smoking, alcohol abuse, nutrition, physical activity) that make up a healthy lifestyle in order to arrange and analyze the data obtained. The study has included various solutions that had already been used, implemented through the computer programs to automate the health risk factor identification (constituting a healthy lifestyle); to ensure comprehensive handling of the identified risk factors, including any assessment, control, monitoring of health risks and efficiency of ongoing activities, automation of recommendations on the identified risk factors, decision support systems developed for both the specialists and the public. As a result of the study, various computer programs have been arranged according to the health risk factors, types of programs, program contents (any main task it completes), target group (main user), and who it is aimed at (subject of study). The prevalence of programs for the specialists (health professionals, doctors, statisticians, etc.) (91%) has been revealed, represented mainly by the programs for health risk degree assessment (61.6%). 93% of computer programs are field-specific and dedicated to a specific risk factor. The “combined” program (decision support system, or DSS) solving several problems at once has been considered in detail. The narrow focus of the program and its compatibility with any operating system have been found. It is revealed that the clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are aimed at specific medical conditions (for example, when determining the cardiovascular diseases). Moreover, there are the decision support modules aimed at the users. All analyzed data have a specific application to the target group (for example, women, children, etc. and/or specialists). No similar studies in relation to this subject in this field of healthcare have been found over the past 10 years.
Reference22 articles.
1. Does deidentification of data from wearable devices give us a false sense of security? A systematic review. Chikwetu, Lucy et al. The Lancet Digital Health, Volume 5, Issue 4, 2023, e239 - e247 DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00234-5.
2. Error in NHS England's BMI calculator and daily calorie recommendations. Flint, Stuart W. The Lancet, Volume 401, Issue 10380, 2023, 913 - 914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00347-1
3. Global action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs 2013-2020. - Text: electronic // Global Health Observatory (GHO) data: [site]. - Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. - URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506236, free (accessed: July 19, 2022).
4. Harada, T.; Miyagami, T.; Kunitomo, K.; Shimizu, T. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Diagnosis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168435.
5. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. Sheikh, Aziz et al. The Lancet Digital Health, Volume 3, Issue 6, 2021, e383 - e396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00005-4.