Antiblackness and Carcerality: Implications for the Study of College Athletics

Author:

Sara E. Grummert

Abstract

We frequently frame criticisms of college athletics in terms of labor exploitation and/or legacies of racism. Though these remain necessary and foundational analytical frames, there are other important frameworks through which we must analyze college athletics to fully understand how and why inequity and racism is both rationalized and compounded. Antiblackness and carcerality—and their deep interconnection—are two such perspectives that both complement and complicate other approaches to the study of college athletics. This paper discusses these two essential theoretical frameworks and demonstrates the nuance that using them in college athletics research provides through several exemplars.

Publisher

University of Oklahoma Libraries

Reference94 articles.

1. Azzarito, L., & Harrison Jr, L. (2008). White men can’t jump': Race, gender and natural athleticism. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(4), 347-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1012690208099871

2. Branch, T. (2011). The shame of college sports. The Atlantic Monthly, 308(3), 80-110.

3. Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press.

4. Coakley, J. (2002). Using sports to control deviance and violence among youths: Let’s be critical and cautious. In M. Gatz, M.A. Messner, & S.J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Paradoxes of youth and sport (pp. 13-30). State University of New York Press.

5. Coakley, J. (2017). Sports in society: Issues and controversies. McGraw-Hill Education.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3