Flipping the Narrative: A Unifying Framework for Juvenile Court-based Forensic Social Work Practice

Author:

Walker Elizabeth Loizeaux

Abstract

Professional social workers are trained in multiple competencies and occupy various positions within the forensic landscape. Unified by a code of ethics that emphasizes social justice and the protection and empowerment of marginalized populations and a philosophical approach that recognizes the interplay of individual and environmental factors, social work leadership in youth justice policy and practice is vital. This article proposes a unifying framework for macro, mezzo, and micro court-based forensic social work practice in the 21st century that draws from post-modern critical social work theory. The lifelong negative impacts of court involvement for young people are well documented and contribute to persistent societal inequities. Pre-disposition court practices can mitigate or further harm court-involved youth. “Flipping the Narrative” is a culturally relevant practice framework for evaluating and designing youth court practices that recognize the intersectionality of the identities and experiences of court-involved youth. The proposed framework incorporates the practical implications of Critical Theory, specifically Critical Race Theory, the Theory of African American Offending, and Queer Theory,  and relevant practice approaches, such as Social Justice Youth Development and Narrative Therapy, to analyze current youth court practices, propose areas for further evaluation and innovation, and recommend practice enhancements for defense-based forensic social workers. The urgency for innovation in one New England state is illustrated through a case study.  

Publisher

University of Oklahoma Libraries

Reference31 articles.

1. Amemiya, J., Kieta, J., & Monahan, K. C. (2017). Adolescent Offenders’ Qualitative Reflections on Desistance from Crime. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell), 27(4), 765–781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12313

2. Arnett, C. (2018, June 22). Virtual Shackles: Electronic Surveillance and the Adultification of Juvenile Courts. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 108(3). 399. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol108/iss3/1

3. Blessett, B., & Gaynor, T. S. (2021). Race, Racism and Administrative Callousness: Using Critical Race Theory for a Race-Conscious Public Administration. Public Integrity, 23(5), 455–458. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1967011

4. Burrell, S., & Stacy, R. (2011). Collateral consequences of juvenile delinquency proceedings in California. Pacific Juvenile Defender Center. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/PJDC-CA-Collateral-Consequences-Handbook-2011.pdf

5. Capizzi, T., & Stucki, D. (2018, May 29). Juvenile Justice Reform Initiatives in the United States [Slides]. World Conference on Justice for Children 2018. https://2018.justicewithchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ANTHONY-CAPIZZI-PRESENTATION-ROOM-VI-29.05.18.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3