Carbon cycle: ESP and UAV data processing approaches for forest ecosystem monitoring examples-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Carbon cycle: ESP and UAV data processing approaches for forest ecosystem monitoring examples

Published:2024-03-07 Issue:4 Volume: Page:45-52
ISSN:2619-1563
Container-title:Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies
language:
Short-container-title:Russian Journal of geophysical technologies

Author:

Platonova M. V.¹,Kotler V. D.¹,Kukharskii A. V.¹,Ivanov S. Yu.¹

Affiliation:

1. Novosibirsk State University

Abstract

The review article provides a comprehensive overview of modern methods and approaches for processing large volumes of observational data in the context of monitoring forest ecosystems. The article shows examples of processing various data obtained using Earth remote sensing (ERS) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Particular attention is paid to assessing the carbon cycle; the practice of using machine learning methods in processing monitoring data is also discussed in detail, as they play a key role in increasing the accuracy of the resulting estimates. The article also discusses modern geographic information systems designed for complex analysis of data from various natural complexes.

Publisher

Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics (SB RAS)

Reference24 articles.

1. Baldocchi D., Falge E., Gu L., Olson R., Hollinger D., Running S., Anthoni P., Bernhofer Ch., Davis K., Evans R., Fuentes J., Goldstein A., Katul G., Law B., Lee X., Malhi Y., Meyers T., Munger W., Oechel W., Paw K.T., Pilegaard K., Schmid H.P., Valentini R., Verma S., Vesala T., Wilson K., Wofsy S. FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities // Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. – 2001. – Vol. 82 (11). – P. 2415–2434, doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2.

2. Bourgoin C., Blanc L., Bailly J.S., Cornu G., Berenguer E., Oszwald J., Tritsch I., Laurent, F., Hasan, A.F., Sist, P., Gond V. The potential of multisource remote sensing for mapping the biomass of a degraded Amazonian forest // Forests. – 2018. – Vol. 9. – Article 303, doi: 10.3390/f9060303.

3. Brandt L.A., Derby Lewis A., Fahey R.T., Scott L., Darling L., Swanston C.W. A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change // Environmental Science and Policy. – 2016. – Vol. 66. – P. 393–402, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.005.

4. Carreiras J.M.B., Melo J.B., Vasconcelos M.J. Estimating the above-ground biomass in Miombo savanna woodlands using L-band synthetic aperture radar data // Remote Sensing. – 2013. – Vol. 5. – P. 1524–1548, doi: 10.3390/rs5041524.

5. Clark M.L., Aide T.M., Grau H.R., Riner G. A scalable approach to mapping annual land cover at 250 m using MODIS time series data: A case study in the Dry Chaco ecoregion of South America // Remote Sensing of Environment. – 2010. – Vol. 114 (11). – P. 2816–2832, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.001.