Veterinary clinicians prefer template-style reports with personal confidence estimates for cytologic sample evaluations

Author:

Rishniw Mark12,Freeman Kathleen P.1

Affiliation:

1. Veterinary Information Network, Davis, CA

2. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE To examine preferences of veterinary clinical pathologists, clinicians, and students for cytology report formats. SAMPLE 24 clinical pathologists, 1,014 veterinarians, and 93 veterinary students who were members of the Veterinary Information Network. METHODS Members of the Veterinary Information Network responded to an online survey invitation, made available between July 11, 2023, and July 24, 2023. Respondents were randomly directed to 1 of 4 sets of cytology reports, each containing a traditional narrative format, narrative format with terms expressing a degree of confidence and associated numerical ranges, and template format with similar estimates of confidence. Respondents ranked the reports in order of preference and then provided comments about their top-ranked choice. Responses were analyzed mostly with descriptive statistics or comparisons of proportions. RESULTS 14 of 24 clinical pathologists preferred the traditional narrative format, whereas 449 of 1,042 veterinary clinicians and veterinary students preferred the template format. Respondents (460/1,131) ranked the template format as most preferred, but the narrative format with terms expressing a degree of confidence ranked highest overall. Many respondents appeared to misunderstand the degree of confidence estimates being expressed numerically. Respondents choosing each format often stated that their preferred choice was “easiest to understand” and “most comprehensive.” CLINICAL RELEVANCE Given the preferences of veterinary clinicians and veterinary students for a template format, clinical pathologists should consider modifying the way they report evaluations of cytologic specimens. Template formats should help standardize reporting of cytologic specimens, thereby improving communication between clinical pathologists and clinicians. However, both clinicians and clinical pathologists need to better understand the purpose of terminology expressing degrees of confidence in such reports.

Publisher

American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)

Subject

General Veterinary

Reference27 articles.

1. Clinicians are from Mars and pathologists are from Venus;Powsner SM,2000

2. Communicating diagnostic uncertainty in surgical pathology reports: disparities between sender and receiver;Lindley SW,2014

3. Preferences of clinical pathologists for probability-modifying terms describing cytologic sample evaluations: a survey study;Rishniw M

4. Clinical pathologists should limit modifier terms used to denote probability of a diagnosis: a survey-based study;Rishniw M,2023

5. Structured CT reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: impact on completeness of information and interdisciplinary communication for surgical planning;Malik RF,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3