Affiliation:
1. Veterinary Information Network, Davis, CA
2. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To examine preferences of veterinary clinical pathologists, clinicians, and students for cytology report formats.
SAMPLE
24 clinical pathologists, 1,014 veterinarians, and 93 veterinary students who were members of the Veterinary Information Network.
METHODS
Members of the Veterinary Information Network responded to an online survey invitation, made available between July 11, 2023, and July 24, 2023. Respondents were randomly directed to 1 of 4 sets of cytology reports, each containing a traditional narrative format, narrative format with terms expressing a degree of confidence and associated numerical ranges, and template format with similar estimates of confidence. Respondents ranked the reports in order of preference and then provided comments about their top-ranked choice. Responses were analyzed mostly with descriptive statistics or comparisons of proportions.
RESULTS
14 of 24 clinical pathologists preferred the traditional narrative format, whereas 449 of 1,042 veterinary clinicians and veterinary students preferred the template format. Respondents (460/1,131) ranked the template format as most preferred, but the narrative format with terms expressing a degree of confidence ranked highest overall. Many respondents appeared to misunderstand the degree of confidence estimates being expressed numerically. Respondents choosing each format often stated that their preferred choice was “easiest to understand” and “most comprehensive.”
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Given the preferences of veterinary clinicians and veterinary students for a template format, clinical pathologists should consider modifying the way they report evaluations of cytologic specimens. Template formats should help standardize reporting of cytologic specimens, thereby improving communication between clinical pathologists and clinicians. However, both clinicians and clinical pathologists need to better understand the purpose of terminology expressing degrees of confidence in such reports.
Publisher
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)
Reference27 articles.
1. Clinicians are from Mars and pathologists are from Venus;Powsner SM,2000
2. Communicating diagnostic uncertainty in surgical pathology reports: disparities between sender and receiver;Lindley SW,2014
3. Preferences of clinical pathologists for probability-modifying terms describing cytologic sample evaluations: a survey study;Rishniw M
4. Clinical pathologists should limit modifier terms used to denote probability of a diagnosis: a survey-based study;Rishniw M,2023
5. Structured CT reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: impact on completeness of information and interdisciplinary communication for surgical planning;Malik RF,2022