Small animal veterinary clients prefer veterinarians to decide when to terminate resuscitation and to be informed after cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE To identify the preferences of small animal veterinary clients for the timing of communication during CPR and whether these clients prefer the veterinarian or pet owner to decide on the termination of resuscitation. SAMPLE Surveys (n = 1,648) were completed between January 20 and February 3, 2023, by clients of the Wilford and Kate Bailey Small Animal Teaching Hospital. METHODS This cross-sectional observational study used an anonymous internet-based survey distributed to 28,000 clients of an academic small animal veterinary hospital. The survey included 16 questions asking for the respondents’ demographics, healthcare professional status, questions pertaining to CPR, and preference for timing of communication during CPR, veterinary team members to speak to, and the decision on termination of resuscitation. An optional open comment section was provided. RESULTS The response rate was 7.5%, including 2,127 responses, with 1,648 complete responses used for further analysis. Of the respondents, 56% and 63% (when asked using a short and long scenario question, respectively) would prefer to be informed about their pet undergoing CPR after CPR has ended. Most clients (84%) wanted the veterinarian to decide when to stop CPR. In the comments section, clients predominantly emphasized that patient care should always be prioritized over client communication. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study contributes to a better understanding of veterinary clients’ preferences and may help improve client communication and decision-making during CPR. More studies are warranted to reach a wider population before broad recommendations can be made.