Do it yourself or send for help? Considering specialty referral from a general practitioner perspective

Abstract

Abstract General practice veterinarians (GPs) are often faced with the question of which services they should provide themselves and which are more appropriately the province of board-certified specialists. The growing availability of specialty care, the expectations of many pet owners for advanced care resembling that which they receive, the expanding availability of new and more technologically sophisticated interventions, and many less easily defined shifts in the economic and cultural context of veterinary medicine all add to the pressure to limit services in general practice and refer more patients to specialists. However, the criteria for making decisions about referral are often ill-defined and controversial. Furthermore, most GPs are trained by specialists in secondary or tertiary care institutions, providing them with a perspective that may not reflect the realities of the general practice environment.While each referral decision for a specific patient must be made in the unique context of that case, reflection and discussion concerning relevant general principles can help GPs build a rational foundation for making such decisions. The principles and methods of evidence-based medicine and the expanding concept of a spectrum of care can usefully inform decision-making about referral. It is also critical that all stakeholders contribute to discussion of these questions and to the training of veterinarians so that the next generation will be prepared to shape and embody the role of GP in a manner that best meets the needs of patients, pet owners, and veterinarians themselves.