Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
2. Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether axial twisting within an ending loop negatively impacts maximum load to failure and failure mode of suture knots.
SAMPLES
525 knots (15 samples each of 7 different suture types/sizes tested in 5 knot-twist configurations each).
PROCEDURES
Each suture type (polydioxanone [PDO], Monoderm [polyglecaprone 25], and Nylon) and size (1, 0, 2-0, 3-0) were used to create a starting square knot, and each of the following ending square knot configurations: 0 twists, 1 twist, 4 twists, and 10 twists. Each suture was tested for failure using a universal testing machine (Instron, Instron Corp) with a 100 kg load cell at a speed of 100 mm/min. Each suture and knot was evaluated for a mode of failure using gross evaluation of the knots and video footage recorded during testing. Maximum load at failure (P-value set at .005) and failure mode (p-value set at 0.003) were recorded for each group.
RESULTS
Maximum load at failure was decreased in knots tied within ending loops containing more twists for some types and sizes of the suture. With 4 twists, 0-PDO, 1 PDO, and 2-0 Nylon was more likely to fail at the knot than knots with 0 twists. All sutures containing 10 twists, except 3-0 Monoderm, were more likely to fail at the knot than knots with 0 twists.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The number of twists within the ending loop may not increase the risk of failure at the knot; however, it can decrease the maximum load to failure at a knot, particularly as the suture size increases.
Publisher
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)
Subject
General Veterinary,General Medicine
Reference18 articles.
1. Physical and mechanical evaluation of five suture materials on three knot configurations: an in vitro study;Abellán D,2016
2. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures;Kim JC,2007
3. Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous polyglyconate monofilament absorbable suture;Gallup DG,1990
4. Handling characteristics of poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) monofilament suture;Tomihata K,2005
5. Surgical manipulation and the tensile strength of polypropylene sutures;Dobrin PB,1989