A Study to Develop a Device to Aid in the Administration of Corticosteroid Nasal Spray to
Improve Efficacy
-
Published:2024-02-15
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2694-5614
-
Container-title:Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:JPRD
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis represent conditions stemming from two pivotal pathophysiological factors: hypersensitivity reactions and inflammation.(Bjermer et al., 2019; Liva et al., 2021; Nur Husna et al., 2022) Patients afflicted with chronic rhinosinusitis experience symptoms that profoundly impact their quality of life. (Sapsaprang et al., 2015) Consequently, treatment guidelines consistently advocate for the utilization of intranasal corticosteroids (INC) in cases of severe disease or disruptive symptoms. (Bousquet et al., 2020; Dykewicz et al., 2020; Emeryk et al., 2019; Scadding et al., 2017) However, clinical evidence suggests that during episodes of nasal mucosal inflammation, tissue edema can hinder the comprehensive dispersion of INC particles into deeper nasal recesses, thus impeding their therapeutic reach to affected regions. (Abdelhafeez, 2022; Rollema et al., 2022; Sher & Ross, 2014) Conversely, presently available nasal spray formulations, particularly aqueous solutions commonly employed in Thailand, exhibit limitations in achieving efficient particle dispersion. Consequently, the effective delivery of INC is significantly contingent upon proper medication administration techniques, including bottle priming and synchronized inhalation during actuation. Literature reviews have divulged that many INC users frequently mismanage or inefficiently apply the medication, particularly during the actuation process.(Al-Rasheedi, 2023; May & Dolen, 2019) Common issues include improper alignment of the nasal spray nozzle, inadequate force exerted during actuation, and failure to synchronize inhalation with medication release, collectively contributing to suboptimal treatment outcomes.
Publisher
Uniscience Publishers LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Bjermer, L., Westman, M., Holmström, M., & Wickman, M. C. (2019). The complex pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis: scientific rationale for the development of an alternative treatment option. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 15, 24. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-018-0314-1 2. Liva, G. A., Karatzanis, A. D., & Prokopakis, E. P. (2021). Review of Rhinitis: Classification, Types, Pathophysiology. J Clin Med, 10(14), 3183. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143183 3. Nur Husna, S. M., Tan, H. T., Md Shukri, N., Mohd Ashari, N. S., & Wong, K. K. (2022). Allergic Rhinitis: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview. Front Med (Lausanne), 9, 874114. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.874114 4. Sapsaprang, S., Setabutr, D., Kulalert, P., Temboonnark, P., & Poachanukoon, O. (2015). Evaluating the impact of allergic rhinitis on quality of life among Thai students. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 5(9), 801-807. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21540 5. Bousquet, J., Schünemann, H. J., Togias, A., Bachert, C., Erhola, M., Hellings, P. W., Klimek, L., Pfaar, O., Wallace, D., Ansotegui, I., Agache, I., Bedbrook, A., Bergmann, K. C., Bewick, M., Bonniaud, P., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., Bossé, I., Bouchard, J., Boulet, L. P…. & Zuberbier, T. (2020). Next-generation Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and real-world evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 145(1), 70-80.e73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.049
|
|