Abstract
Water has a crucial place in the advent of humankind the flourishing of mega population centres, and is an essential source of food, water transportation, and irrigation. The anthropogenic activities in taming the natural water streams to the optimum benefit of human beings disturb natural flood plains, ecology and habitat. The channelisation of streams and hydromodifications in dams, barrages or reservoirs result in climatic variations locally/ regionally and impact transborder stream flow. Researchers have been endeavouring to restore the flood plains to their natural conditions. Still, huge hydromodifications and the development of megacities right in the flood plains or adjacent to the streams have resulted in irreversible disturbances to the natural lay of ground/ landscape. Therefore, to avoid flooding disasters, further structural interventions are undertaken to augment the natural flood prevention methods using advanced materials like cement concrete, steel, and polymers rather than increasing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Considering the strategic necessity of engineering structures as an integrated catchment level solution to augment the natural methods, the researchers/ engineers are now focussing on the use of sustainable, eco-friendly materials and demountable/ hydraulic structures to minimise the carbon footprints of hydromodifications and to decrease the obstruction to the natural flow of streams by using the flood prevention structures/ gates/ walls/ reservoirs only in case of disastrous flooding and otherwise keeping them unemployed during normal stream discharges. This study has been used to review sustainable flood management using natural and structural techniques in the Wharf River catchment in the UK, reviewing the existing research/ flood management schemes giving the pictorial coverage. The study suggests that natural flood management techniques have restricted application parameters and must be augmented by engineering structures to achieve effective flood management against heavy flooding. Low CO2 embodied greener infrastructure structural materials containing supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can be a beneficial option for an environmentally friendly flood management strategy.
Publisher
Uniscience Publishers LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Solin, L., & Skubinčan, P. (2013). Flood risk assessment and management: review of concepts definitions and methods. Geographical Journal, 65(1), 23-44. Retrieved from https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/03101238Solin,%20Skubincan.pdf
2. Keep, H. (2017). Natural Flood Management Measures – a practical guide for farmers. Retrieved from https://thefloodhub.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/A-practical-guide-for-farmers.pdf
3. Werrity, A. (2006). Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm. Area, 38(1), pp. 16-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00658.x
4. Yorkshire Dales River Trust. (2017). Oughtershaw Demonstration. [Facebook]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/pg/yorkshiredalesriverstrust/photos/?tab=album&album_id=1385838591536961
5. Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2002). Non-structural Flood Protection and Sustainability. Water International, 27(1), 3–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060208686972