Law of Group Companies “History and Terminology”

Author:

MİSİLİ Sinan1

Affiliation:

1. BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

The most common way of economic concentration in practice, in the sense of grouping, is manifested in the form of konzern / group companies and corporate mergers. In mergers, companies that merge and become a single company lose both their legal and economic independence. In the konzern economic concentration model, while the affiliated companies maintain their legal independence, they lose their economic independence. This situation is incompatible with a legal system (traditional company law) based on the independence of companies in legal and economic terms. Seeing this incompatibility, the legal systems took action and regulated the company law accordingly. Regulations have been made in Swiss and Turkish Law, especially in Germany. The Turkish legislator put into effect the provisions in accordance with this new order for the first time between the Articles 195 - 209 of the TCC, addressed the issue decisively and thoroughly. While ‘konzern’ is the main legal term used in German law, instead of ‘konzern’, ‘group of companies and ‘group‘ has become a legal term used in Turkish law. While German konzern law considers single handed management as the determining element of konzern within the framework of paragraph AktG § 18, Turkish law of group companies, unlike German konzern law, has not accepted and regulated single handed management systems and as well peer-level konzerns. The Turkish group of companies is mainly explained according to the control principle. If it meets the conditions specified in TCC art. 195, pure holdings (as well as mixed holdings) whose main purpose is to participate in other businesses, will form a group of companies together with the company or companies under its control. ‘Law Of Group Companies” is as a top concept explained and put forward by the TCC articles 195 et seq provisions.

Publisher

Turkiye Adalet Akademisi

Reference40 articles.

1. Aker H, ‘Hâkim İşletme İle Bağımlı Şirket Arasındaki Hukuki İlişki Ve Hâkim İşletmenin Sadakat Borcu,’ (2003) XXII (2) BATIDER 153- 204.

2. Aker H, ‘Türk Ticaret Kanunu Madde 14 Hakkında Bazı Düşünceler ve Yeni Bir Tacir Türü: “HâkimTeşebbüs’, (Haziran 2009) XXV (2) BATIDER 229 – 295 (Hâkim Teşebbüs).

3. Altay S A, Hukuki Açıdan Banka Anonim Ortaklığı, (Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul 2019).

4. Aytaç Z, ‘Bağlı İşletmeler Hukuku ve Türk Hukukundaki Görünüm’, (1976) VIII (4) BATIDER 97 – 125 (Bağlı işletmeler).

5. Aytaç Z, Deutsches und Türkisches Konzernrecht im Vergleich, Freiburg 1975, (Konzernrecht).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3