Abstract
This paper will attempt to demonstrate that a major reason for the fruitfulness of Marx's framework for the analysis of social change was that Marx was, himself, a careful student of technology. By this I mean not only that he was fully aware of, and insisted upon, the historical importance and the social consequences of technology. That much is obvious. Marx additionally devoted much time and effort to explicating the distinctive characteristics of technologies, and to attempting to unravel and examine the inner logic of individual technologies. He insisted that technologies constitute an interesting subject, not only to technologists, but to students of society and social pathology as well, and he was very explicit in the introduction of technological variables into his arguments.<p class="mrlink"><p class="mrpurchaselink"><a href="http://monthlyreview.org/index/volume-28-number-3" title="Vol. 28, No. 3: July-August 1976" target="_self">Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the <em>Monthly Review</em> website.</a></p>
Publisher
Monthly Review Foundation
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Gender Studies
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Automatic Systems after Marx;International Critical Thought;2023-04-03
2. Towards a Socialist Technology;Reflections on Socialism in the Twenty-First Century;2020
3. Monsterization, Mechanization, Contradiction: Marx’s Rhetoric of Technology;Rethinking Marxism;2019-10-02
4. The Role of International Business in the Global Spread of Technological Innovation;International Business and Institutions after the Financial Crisis;2014
5. From mechanical arts to the philosophy of technology;Economics of Innovation and New Technology;2013-10