Affiliation:
1. Kazan State Medical University;
Republican clinical oncological dispensary of the Ministry of Health of the Tatarstan Republic
2. Kazan State Medical University;
Republican Clinical Oncology Center, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan
3. Kazan State Medical University
Abstract
The aim of the study was to improve surgical outcomes in patients with proximal gastric cancer without invading the esophagus.Material and methods. Data regarding lymph node metastasis, short-term postoperative complications/lethality, and long-term outcomes were analyzed in 162 patients with proximal gastric cancer without invasion of the esophagus. All patients underwent gastrosplenectomy with expanded d2 lymph node dissection. The age of the patients ranged from 25 to 91 years, and the median age was 60 years. There were 105 (64.8 %) patients aged over 60 years and 45 (27.8 %) over 70 years.Results. Postoperative complications occurred in 14 patients (8.6 %), 8 of them (4.9 %) died. The 1-, 3- and 5 year survival rates were 85.4 %, 61.8 %, and 38.9 %, respectively.Discussion. In patients with gastric cancer without esophageal invasion, perigastric lymph nodes (№ 3b, 4d) located in segments iv and v are often affected by metastases; therefore, we consider it inexpedient to perform proximal resections in these cases.Conclusion. In patients with proximal gastric cancer without esophageal invasion, it is not advisable to perform proximal subtotal gastric resections due to the high frequency of 3b and 4d lymph node metastases. Postoperative complication and mortality rates were 8.6 % and 4.9 %, respectively in patients who underwent gastrosplenectomy with d2 lymph node dissection.
Publisher
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute
Reference17 articles.
1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov; 68(6): 394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492.
2. Wen L., Chen X.Z., Wu B, Chen X.L., Wang L., Yang K., Zhang B., Chen Z.X., Chen J.P., Zhou Z.G., Li C.M., Hu J.K. Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012; 59(114): 633–40. doi: 10.5754/hge11834.
3. Yura M., Yoshikawa T., Otsuki S., Yamagata Y., Morita S., Katai H., Nishida T., Yoshiaki T. Oncological safety of proximal gastrectomy for T2/T3 proximal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019 Sep; 22(5): 1029–1035. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-00938-8.
4. Vashakmadze L.A., Khomyakov V.M., Cheremisov V.V. The choice of the variant of the reconstruction of patients who had single-step or consequent interference on esophagus and stomach. Medical Almanac. 2011; 5(18): 49–54. (in Russian).
5. Davydov M.M., Turkin I.N. Simultaneous cancer of the esophagus and stomach: epidemiology, clinicoanatomical characterization, choice of treatment. Journal of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS. 2011; (22): 55–63. (in Russian).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献