ANALYSIS OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY AND POSITRON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY WITH 18F-FDG IN IDENTIFICATION OF SPINAL AND PELVIC BONE METASTASES-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

ANALYSIS OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY AND POSITRON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY WITH 18F-FDG IN IDENTIFICATION OF SPINAL AND PELVIC BONE METASTASES

Published:2021-10-31 Issue:5 Volume:20 Page:100-107
ISSN:2312-3168
Container-title:Siberian journal of oncology
language:
Short-container-title:Sib. onkol. ž.

Author:

Laryukov A. V.¹^ORCID,Hasanov R. Sh.²^ORCID,Afanasyeva Z. A.³^ORCID,Laryukova E. K.³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kazan State Medical Academy – Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Republic Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Ministry of Health of Tatarstan Republic; Kazan State Medical University

2. Kazan State Medical Academy – Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

3. Kazan State Medical Academy – Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Institution of Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Republic Clinical Oncology Dispensary of the Ministry of Health of Tatarstan Republic

Abstract

Background. The treatment outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depend on the tumor stage and treatment strategy. The imaging techniques play a significant role in the diagnosis, staging and choice of appropriate treatment for NSCLC.Purpose of the study: сomparison of the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MR) and positron emission computed tomography to select the optimal approaches to early detection of spinal and pelvic bone metastases.Material and Methods. The treatment outcomes were analyzed in 71 patients with NSCLC. Spinal and pelvic bone metastases were detected in 24 patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT). Multiple bone lesions were the most common. A total of 69 metastatic lesions were identified. To compare the capabilities of diagnostic techniques, all patients underwent PET/CT with 18F-FDG, and MRI of the spine and pelvic bones using diffused-weighted images (DWI). Statistical data processing included the calculation of the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of the above techniques.Conclusion. The comparative analysis of the capabilities of modern high-tech diagnostic techniques (PET/CT with 18F-FDG and MRI of the spine and pelvic bones with DWI) in early detection of bone metastases in patients with NSCLC, PET/CT with 18F-FDG showed the greatest diagnostic value. However, taking into account the high sensitivity and specificity of MRI with DVI in detection of bone metastases and limited availability of PET/CT for patients, MRI with DVI is recommended to exclude bone metastases.

Publisher

Tomsk Cancer Research Institute

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference12 articles.

1. Davydov M.I., Polotskii B.E. Lung cancer. Moscow, 2003. 454 p. (in Russian).

2. Kaprin A.D., Starinskij V.V., Shaxzadova A.O. The state of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2019. Moscow, 2020. 239 p. (in Russian).

3. Ejima Y., Matsuo Y., Sasaki R. The current status and future of radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases. J Orthop Sci. 2015 Jul; 20(4): 585–92. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0720-x.

4. Laryukov A.V., Laryukova E.K. Distant metastasis features of peripheral nonsmall cell lung cancer. Practical Medicine. 2012; 7(62): 163–165. (in Russian).

5. Machado Medeiros T., Altmayer S., Watte G., Zanon M., Basso Dias A., Henz Concatto N., Hoefel Paes J., Mattiello R., de Souza Santos F., Mohammed T.L., Verma N., Hochhegger B. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul; 30(7): 3641–3649. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06703-1.