Variability in surgical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (literature review)
-
Published:2023-05-04
Issue:2
Volume:22
Page:160-167
-
ISSN:2312-3168
-
Container-title:Siberian journal of oncology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Sib. onkol. ž.
Author:
Dobrodeev A. Yu.1ORCID, Kostromitsky D. N.1ORCID, Afanasyev S. G.1ORCID, Tarasova A. S.1ORCID, Babyshkina N. N.2ORCID, Ponomareva A. A.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Cancer Research Institute, Тomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences 2. Cancer Research Institute, Тomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences;
Siberian State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Abstract
Background. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers and one of the most leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Approximately 35 % of CRC patients have liver metastases at the time of diagnosis. These patients have a poor prognosis, with the 5-year survival rate of 15 %. Given the poor survival with currently approved methods, the development of the optimal treatment options is needed.The purpose of the study was to search for data on the development of surgical techniques for the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) with isolated liver metastasis.Material and Methods. Literature search was carried out in Medline, Cochrane Library, Elibrary and Pubmed databases, including publications characterizing historical and modern results (from 1976 to 2021).Results. Liver resection in mCRC patients with isolated liver metastasis is the only treatment that offers a chance of increasing the 5-year survival rate up to 45–60 %. Radical surgery should include the removal of the primary tumor and all metastases with negative histological resection margins while preserving sufficient functional liver parenchyma. The paper discusses various approaches to surgical treatment of mCRC patients with liver metastases, with an assessment of their advantages and disadvantages, as well as presents data on perioperative and oncological outcomes.Conclusion. The surgical treatment strategy should be adapted for each mCRC patient with synchronous liver metastases. The core function of a multidisciplinary team is to determine the patient’s treatment plan combining surgery and systemic chemotherapy, which will improve the immediate and long-term treatment outcomes.
Publisher
Tomsk Cancer Research Institute
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference45 articles.
1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3): 209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. 2. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Shakhzadova A.O. The status of cancer care for the population of Russia in 2021. Moscow, 2022. 239 p. (in Russian). 3. Valderrama-Treviño A.I., Barrera-Mera B., Ceballos-Villalva J.C., Montalvo-Javé E.E. Hepatic Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2017; 7(2): 166–75. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals10018-1241. 4. Jegatheeswaran S., Mason J.M., Hancock H.C., Siriwardena A.K. The liver-frst approach to the management of colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148(4): 385–91. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1216. 5. Van Cutsem E., Cervantes A., Adam R., Sobrero A., Van Krieken J.H., Aderka D., Aranda Aguilar E., Bardelli A., Benson A., Bodoky G., Ciardiello F., D’Hoore A., Diaz-Rubio E., Douillard J.Y., Ducreux M., Falcone A., Grothey A., Gruenberger T., Haustermans K., Heinemann V., Hoff P., Köhne C.H., Labianca R., Laurent-Puig P., Ma B., Maughan T., Muro K., Normanno N., Österlund P., Oyen W.J., Papamichael D., Pentheroudakis G., Pfeiffer P., Price T.J., Punt C., Ricke J., Roth A., Salazar R., Scheithauer W., Schmoll H.J., Tabernero J., Taïeb J., Tejpar S., Wasan H., Yoshino T., Zaanan A., Arnold D. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(8): 1386–422. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235.
|
|