Choosing a language strategy for a top-rated Russian academic journal

Author:

Kuznetsova T. Yu.1ORCID,Silnichaya A. V.2ORCID,Evgrafova A. O.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

2. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)

3. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)

Abstract

Increasing citation and improving the impact factor is a challenging task for both authors and scientific journals. It is particularly so for Russian journals indexed in international scientometric databases, including Web of Science and Scopus. This study shows that researchers consider inefficient language strategies to be one of the main reasons for poor international outreach. This article explores    the strategies of several Russian journals indexed in Scopus as of March 2022, identifies their advantages and disadvantages as well as the subsequent risks. The study offers recommendations for choosing an optimal language strategy, including the one aimed at increasing citation in international and national databases and promoting rated Russian journals internationally. Based on the analysis of the journals indexed in the Scopus database, six linguistic models have been identified. The study has shown that the bilingual format – publishing in Russian and English – provides the best visibility at the national and international levels.

Publisher

Association of Science Editors and Publishers

Reference11 articles.

1. Soloshenko N. S., Kirillova O. V. Otrazhenie rossiiskikh zhurnalov v BD Science Citation Index i SCOPUS. Educational Technology & Society. 2006;9(3):313–320.

2. Mikhailov A. S. Pochemu rossiiskie publikatsii chitayut, no ne tsitiruyut. Indikator. 14 dekabrya 2020 g. URL: https://indicator.ru/humanitarian-science/pochemu-rossiiskie-publikacii-chitayut-no-ne-citiruyut.htm (data obrashcheniya: 18.03.2022).

3. Liu F., Hu G., Tang L. et al. The penalty of containing more non-English articles. Scientometrics. 2018;114:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2577-6

4. Liang L., Rousseau R., Zhong Z. Non-English journals and papers in physics and chemistry: bias in citations? Scientometrics. 2013;95:333–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0828-0

5. Bornmann L., Schier H., Marx W., Daniel H. D. What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics. 2012;6(1):11–18.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3