The Perceptions of Middle School Teachers of English on the Learning Outcomes Framework and Continuous Assessment

Author:

Chircop Zahra LinetteORCID

Abstract

This research paper investigates how teachers of English teaching in state middle schools around Malta perceive the Learning Outcomes Framework and the introduction of Continuous Assessment. This study identifies the teachers’ opinions on these phenomena and their implications on teaching and learning. Data was collected through qualitative online questionnaires and a semi-structured interview with an Education Officer (EO). This research identified that teachers are aware of the advantages of the Learning Outcomes Framework and Continuous Assessment on learning; however, they also acknowledge the added workload and extra preparation they entail. The data analysis revealed that teachers are familiar with what Continuous Assessment and Formative Assessment imply, yet have difficulty with defining differences. In conclusion, both the number of Learning Outcomes and the teachers’ workload must be reduced.

Publisher

Institute for Education

Reference25 articles.

1. Adams, A. & Cox, A. L. (2008). Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups. In P. Cairns & A. L. Cox (Eds.), Research Methods for Human Computer Interaction (pp. 17–34). Cambridge University Press.

2. Attard Tonna, M., & Bugeja, G. (2016). A reflection on the learning outcomes framework project [Commentary]. Malta Review of Educational Research, 10(1), 169–176.

3. Bednall, J. (2006). Epoche and bracketing within the phenomenological paradigm. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 123–138. https://ife.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarlyjournals/epoche-bracketing-withinphenomenological/docview/2393188017/se-2

4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

5. Clark, I. (2010). Formative Assessment: ‘There is nothing so practical as a good theory’. Australian Journal of Education, 54(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411005400308

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3