How is the Learning Outcomes Framework Responding to an Internationalised School Culture in Primary Schools in Malta?

Author:

Schembri HeathcliffORCID

Abstract

The Maltese education system is experiencing a revolutionary reform in the way the teaching and learning process is designed at all levels, including primary schooling. As of 2018, the island has started shifting from a content-based to an outcomes-based system, referred to as the introduction, or better, the enactment of the Learning Outcomes Framework (2015). The LOF is being promoted as a way to decentralize teaching and give schools the autonomy to develop their own learning programmes. This structure is in line and has been assembled to support the National Curriculum Framework (2012). Since the LOF is the first curriculum framework to be introduced in Malta since its membership in the EU in 2004, it is also devised to reflect other policy documents issued by the EU. This paper explains how the LOF reflects such documents and determines ways how the LOF is responding to internationalisation present in primary schools in Malta. A literature review of the current field scenario is presented. This is followed by an in-depth analysis of recent local policy developments and current practices which reflect how the enactment of the LOF in Malta is contributing to multicultural climates. The results indicate that although objectives are set, many are still not understanding why the enactment of the LOF, and how this promotes internationalisation in Malta. Further provision of professional training to educators and other stakeholders in primary schools, further support to schools, and proper engagement of all students are recommended to reach the set objectives.

Publisher

Institute for Education

Reference42 articles.

1. Aldridge, J.M. et al. (2006) ‘School-level environment and outcomes-based education in South Africa’, Learning Environments Research 9: 123–147. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-006-9009-5.

2. Allais, S. (2012) ‘Claims vs. practicalities: lessons about using learning outcomes’, Journal of Education and Work 25(3): 331-354. DOI: 10.1080/13639080.2012.687570.

3. Andrich, D. (2002) ‘A framework relating outcomes based education and the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives’, Studies in Educational Evaluation 28: 35–59.

4. Arjun, P. (1998) ‘An evaluation of the proposed new curricula for schools in relation to Kuhn's conception of paradigms and paradigm shifts’, South African Journal of Higher Education 12(1): 20-26.

5. Attard Tonna, M., and Bugeja, G. (2016) ‘A reflection on the learning outcomes framework project [Commentary]’, Malta Review of Educational Research, 10(1): 169-176.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3