Comparative Analysis of ADASYN-SVM and SMOTE-SVM Methods on the Detection of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Author:

Ramadhan Nur Ghaniaviyanto

Abstract

Most people with diabetes in the world are type 2. We can detect diabetes early to prevent things that are not desirable by checking sugar and insulin levels with the doctor. In addition to using this method, people with diabetes can also be grouped based on data from diabetes examination results. However, most of the data on health examination results have several parameters that are difficult for the public to understand. These problems can be done by means of automatic classification. In addition to these problems, there is another problem in the form of an unbalanced amount of data for diabetics and non-diabetics. This problem can be done by balancing the amount of data using the model to increase the ratio of the amount of data that is small or decrease the ratio of the amount of data that is too much. Purpose: This study aims to detect type 2 diabetes mellitus using the SVM classification model and analyze the results of the comparison using the SMOTE and ADASYN data balancing technique which is the best. Methods/Study design/approach: The research method starts from collecting the diabetes dataset, then the dataset cleaning process is carried out whether there is a null value or not. After applying two oversampling methods to analyze which method is the most appropriate. After the oversampling technique was carried out, data classification was carried out using a support vector machine model to see the accuracy results. Result/Findings: The results obtained by the ADASYN-SVM method are superior to SMOTE-SVM. The ADASYNSVM method has an accuracy of 87.3%, while the SMOTE-SVM has an accuracy of 85.4%. Novelty/Originality/Value: The data used in this study came from the Karya Medika clinic, Indonesia which contains parameters related to type 2 diabetes.

Publisher

Universitas Negeri Semarang

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3