Orthopaedic registries: the German experience-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Orthopaedic registries: the German experience

Published:2019-06 Issue:6 Volume:4 Page:401-408
ISSN:2396-7544
Container-title:EFORT Open Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:EFORT Open Reviews

Author:

Jansson Volkmar¹,Grimberg Alexander²,Melsheimer Oliver²,Perka Carsten³,Steinbrück Arnd¹²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany

2. German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH), Berlin, Germany

3. Charité Center for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

National joint registries are gaining more and more importance in the fields of implant monitoring/outlier detection and quality of care. The German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) was established in 2010 for the purpose of observing the impact of primary hip and knee arthroplasty on the German population. Having now over one million documentations, we introduce the structure of the EPRD and detail the process of data collection. We report on some preliminary trends and contrast these with findings from other joint registries. We introduce the overhauled Arthroplasty Library, that resulted from an international collaboration with National Joint Registry of England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180064

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180064

Reference10 articles.

1. A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries

2. Register als Werkzeug für mehr Endoprothesensicherheit

3. Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries’ Definitions of Revision

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Best timing of bilateral total hip arthroplasty – an analysis of revision and mortality rates from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD);BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2024-08-02

2. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty demonstrating a significant increased risk for aseptic revisions compared to unconstrained and constrained total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of aseptic revisions after unicondylar and primary total knee arthroplasty of the German Arthroplasty Registry;Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;2024-04-21

3. Low implantation volume, comorbidities, male sex and implantation of constrained TKA identified as risk factors for septic revision in knee arthroplasty: A register‐based study from the German Arthroplasty Registry;Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;2024-04-17

4. Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry;Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery;2024-04-16

5. Bewertung der Berichte des Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) unter Berücksichtigung der EndoCert-Anforderungen: Empfehlungen für am EPRD teilnehmende Kliniken und EndoCert-Fachexperten;Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie;2024-03-22