Cemented versus uncemented hip implant fixation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cemented versus uncemented hip implant fixation

Published:2019-12 Issue:12 Volume:8 Page:604-607
ISSN:2046-3758
Container-title:Bone & Joint Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Bone & Joint Research

Author:

Konan Sujith¹,Abdel Matthew P.²,Haddad Fares S.³

Affiliation:

1. University College Hospital and The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

3. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Princess Grace Hospital, and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCL H, London, UK

Abstract

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/2046-3758.812.BJR-2019-0337

Reference19 articles.

1. No authors listed. National Tariff Payment System 2019/20: a consultation notice. A joint publication by NHS England and NHS Improvement. 2019. https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/national-tariff-1920-consultation/ (date last accessed 19 November 2019).

2. The influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep in a collarless polished tapered stem

3. Biomechanical behaviour of a French femoral component with thin cement mantle

4. Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis

5. Cemented or cementless fixation for primary hip arthroplasty—evidence from The International Joint Replacement Registries

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Design and Verification of a Metaphyseal Filling Stem for Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Novel Measurements of Proximal Femoral Anatomy;Arthroplasty Today;2024-02

2. Radiographic Assessment of Bone Quality Using 4 Radiographic Indexes: Canal Diaphysis Ratio Is Superior;The Journal of Arthroplasty;2024-02

3. Sex-Specific Implant Fixation Can Reduce Revision Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evidence From the Swiss National Joint Registry;The Journal of Arthroplasty;2024-02

4. What Are the Differences in Hospital Cost Associated With the Use of Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Stems in Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture?;The Journal of Arthroplasty;2024-02

5. A Radiographic Evaluation of Uncemented Total Hip Replacements and the Role of Uncemented Implants in the Management of Hip Osteoarthritis in the Elderly Population;Cureus;2023-12-13