Cemented versus uncemented hip implant fixation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cemented versus uncemented hip implant fixation

Published:2019-12 Issue:12 Volume:8 Page:604-607
ISSN:2046-3758
Container-title:Bone & Joint Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Bone & Joint Research

Author:

Konan Sujith¹,Abdel Matthew P.²,Haddad Fares S.³

Affiliation:

1. University College Hospital and The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

3. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Princess Grace Hospital, and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCL H, London, UK

Abstract

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/2046-3758.812.BJR-2019-0337

Reference19 articles.

1. No authors listed. National Tariff Payment System 2019/20: a consultation notice. A joint publication by NHS England and NHS Improvement. 2019. https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/national-tariff-1920-consultation/ (date last accessed 19 November 2019).

2. The influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep in a collarless polished tapered stem

3. Biomechanical behaviour of a French femoral component with thin cement mantle

4. Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis

5. Cemented or cementless fixation for primary hip arthroplasty—evidence from The International Joint Replacement Registries

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effect of fixation type on periprosthetic fractures in high-risk patients who have osteoporosis undergoing total joint arthroplasty;Journal of Orthopaedics;2024-10

2. Comparative analysis of femoral bone loss: uncemented vs. cemented aseptic stem loosening in first-time revision surgery—a retrospective evaluation of 215 patients;Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery;2024-08-27

3. Factors that influence surgical decision-making for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures: Bullet Health Analysis (BHA) I;European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology;2024-06-08

4. Impact of fixation method on femoral bone loss: a retrospective evaluation of stem loosening in first-time revision total hip arthroplasty among two hundred and fifty five patients;International Orthopaedics;2024-06-01

5. Are current rates of uncemented fixation in total hip arthroplasty supported by the literature? An update on the uncemented paradox;HIP International;2024-05-03