Clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery

Published:2014-05 Issue:5 Volume:3 Page:169-174
ISSN:2046-3758
Container-title:Bone & Joint Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Bone & Joint Research

Author:

Rangan A.¹,Jefferson L.²,Baker P.¹,Cook L.²

Affiliation:

1. The James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesborough, TS4 3BW, UK.

2. University of York, York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the role of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review confirms growing international awareness of the important role research networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial for successful delivery of RCTs. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:169–74.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Link

https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/2046-3758.35.2000265

Reference37 articles.

1. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don't understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons' experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT

2. Levels of Evidence in Research Published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) Over the Last Thirty Years

3. Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Wells GAIncluding non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green, S, ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2: updated September 2009. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009 (date last accessed 16 April 2014).

4. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

5. Resolving Controversies in Hip Fracture Care: The Need for Large Collaborative Trials in Hip Fractures

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation of Community Involvement and Development in an Orthopedic Hospital;Healthcare;2024-06-27

2. Teaching Science to the Next Generation;Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery;2023-08

3. History and Accomplishments of the North American Clinical Trials Network (NACTN) for Spinal Cord Injury, 2004 to 2022 ;Journal of Neurotrauma;2022-12-14

4. Weight-bearing in ankle fractures: An audit of UK practice;The Foot;2019-06

5. Understanding the factors that influence patient participation in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials;International Orthopaedics;2018-03-20