The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions

Author:

Eckert Johannes Adrian12ORCID,Bitsch Rudi G.3,Sonntag Robert1,Reiner Tobias12,Schwarze Martin12,Jaeger Sebastian1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory of Biomechanics and Implant Research, Centre for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

2. Orthopaedic University Hospital, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

3. ATOS Clinics International, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Aims The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation. Methods Single and twin pegs were implanted randomly allocated in 12 pairs of human fresh-frozen femora. We generated 5° bone defects at the posterior condyle. Relative movement was simulated using a servohydraulic pulser, and analyzed at 70°/115° knee flexion. Relative movement was surveyed at seven points of measurement on implant and bone, using an optic system. Results At the main fixation zone, the twin peg shows less relative movement at 70°/115°. At the transition zone, relative movements are smaller for the single peg for both angles. The single peg shows higher compression at 70° flexion, whereas the twin peg design shows higher compression at 115°. X-displacement is significantly higher for the single peg at 115°. Conclusion Bony defects should be avoided in OUKA. The twin peg shows high resilience against push-out force and should be preferred over the single peg. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):82–90.

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference38 articles.

1. Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

2. Epidemiology of Osteoarthritis

3. Epidemiologic studies for osteoarthritis: new versus conventional study design approaches

4. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland Annual Report. 2020. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/10/PDFdownloads/NJR%2017th%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf (date last accessed 9 December 2021).

5. Robertsson O, W-Dahl A, Lidgren L, Sundberg M. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report. 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Annette-W-Dahl/publication/321301028_The_Swedish_Knee_Arthroplasty_Register_Annual_Report_2017/links/5a1aab9ea6fdcc50adeb1a60/The-Swedish-Knee-Arthroplasty-Register-Annual-Report-2017.pdf (date last accessed 9 December 2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3