Affiliation:
1. Surgery Department, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
2. Umm Al-Qura University College of Medicine, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
3. Surgery Department, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Canada
Abstract
AimsIsolated fractures of the ulnar diaphysis are uncommon, occurring at a rate of 0.02 to 0.04 per 1,000 cases. Despite their infrequency, these fractures commonly give rise to complications, such as nonunion, limited forearm pronation and supination, restricted elbow range of motion, radioulnar synostosis, and prolonged pain. Treatment options for this injury remain a topic of debate, with limited research available and no consensus on the optimal approach. Therefore, this trial aims to compare clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of two treatment methods: open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus nonoperative treatment in patients with isolated ulnar diaphyseal fractures.MethodsThis will be a multicentre, open-label, parallel randomized clinical trial (under National Clinical Trial number NCT01123447), accompanied by a parallel prospective cohort group for patients who meet the inclusion criteria, but decline randomization. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment groups: 1) nonoperative treatment with closed reduction and below-elbow casting; or 2) surgical treatment with ORIF utilizing a limited contact dynamic compression plate and screw construct. The primary outcome measured will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score at 12 months post-injury. Additionally, functional outcomes will be assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and pain visual analogue scale, allowing for a comparison of outcomes between groups. Secondary outcome measures will encompass clinical outcomes such as range of motion and grip strength, radiological parameters including time to union, as well as economic outcomes assessed from enrolment to 12 months post-injury.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by the lead site Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB; REB14-2004) and local ethics boards at each participating site. Findings from the trial will be disseminated through presentations at regional, national, and international scientific conferences and public forums. The primary results and secondary findings will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):411–418.
Publisher
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Reference25 articles.
1. Isolated fractures of the shaft of the ulna;Du Toit;S Afr Med J,1979
2. Interventions for isolated diaphyseal fractures of the ulna in adults;Pearce;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2000
3. Interventions for isolated diaphyseal fractures of the ulna in adults;Handoll;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2004
4. Nye
N
,
Beutler
A
.
Midshaft ulna and radius fractures in adults
.
UpToDate
.
February
2
,
2024
.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/midshaft-ulna-and-radius-fractures-in-adults#H956357621
(
date last
accessed
26 April 2024
).